Suppr超能文献

两个教育模块对从业者小儿谵妄知识的影响。

Impact of Two Educational Modules on Practitioner Knowledge of Pediatric Delirium.

作者信息

Gabbard Allyson D, Patatanian Leslie K

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul-Aug;23(4):329-336. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.4.329.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of education modules in preparing staff before the implementation of a pediatric delirium screening protocol.

METHODS

After consenting participants began phase 1 of the study, which covered general information on pediatric delirium. It comprised a 21-question assessment administered as a pretest followed by an education module and then the same 21-question assessment administered as a posttest. After completing phase 1, participants proceeded to phase 2, which focused on use of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) tool. It comprised an education module and a 14-question postassessment. Participants completed these phases at their convenience via provided instruction documents. Assessments were delivered through the online service SurveyMonkey. Education modules were available online as invisible YouTube videos.

RESULTS

A total of 50 nurses and pharmacists gave consent, and 37 of these participants initiated phase 1. All 37 participants completed the phase 1 preassessment, averaging a score of 46% (range, 29%-71%). A total of 27 participants completed the phase 1 postassessment, with an average score of approximately 76% (range, 48%-95%). A total of 20 participants, with no prior training on the CAPD, completed the phase 2 postassessment, averaging a score of 88% (range, 43%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the pediatric delirium general education module and the CAPD use education module resulted in participant learning, as evidenced by the assessment score averages.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估教育模块在实施儿科谵妄筛查方案前对工作人员进行培训的效果。

方法

在参与者同意后,研究进入第一阶段,内容涵盖儿科谵妄的一般信息。该阶段包括一项21道题的预测试评估,随后是一个教育模块,然后是同样的21道题的后测试评估。完成第一阶段后,参与者进入第二阶段,重点是使用康奈尔儿科谵妄评估(CAPD)工具。该阶段包括一个教育模块和一项14道题的后评估。参与者可根据提供的指导文件,在方便的时候完成这些阶段。评估通过在线服务SurveyMonkey进行。教育模块以不可见的YouTube视频形式在线提供。

结果

共有50名护士和药剂师同意参与,其中37名参与者开始了第一阶段。所有37名参与者都完成了第一阶段的预评估,平均得分46%(范围为29%-71%)。共有27名参与者完成了第一阶段的后评估,平均得分约为76%(范围为48%-95%)。共有20名之前未接受过CAPD培训的参与者完成了第二阶段的后评估,平均得分88%(范围为43%-100%)。

结论

儿科谵妄通识教育模块和CAPD使用教育模块均使参与者有所收获,评估得分平均值证明了这一点。

相似文献

1
Impact of Two Educational Modules on Practitioner Knowledge of Pediatric Delirium.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul-Aug;23(4):329-336. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.4.329.
2
Pediatric trainees' engagement in the online nutrition curriculum: preliminary results.
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 16;14:190. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-190.
7
8
Determining Interrater Reliability of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Screening Tool Among PICU Nurses.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;20(4):e216-e220. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001896.
9
The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: Translation and inter-rater reliability in a Danish pediatric intensive care unit.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Aug;63(7):900-904. doi: 10.1111/aas.13369. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Identifying Barriers to Delirium Screening and Prevention in the Pediatric ICU: Evaluation of PICU Staff Knowledge.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in critically ill children.
J Intensive Care. 2016 Oct 26;4:65. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0189-5. eCollection 2016.
2
Cost Associated With Pediatric Delirium in the ICU.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):e1175-e1179. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002004.
4
Evaluation of the Safety of Quetiapine in Treating Delirium in Critically Ill Children: A Retrospective Review.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2015 Nov;25(9):666-70. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0093. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
5
Identifying Barriers to Delirium Screening and Prevention in the Pediatric ICU: Evaluation of PICU Staff Knowledge.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
On risk factors for pediatric delirium at noon.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 May;16(4):375-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000371.
7
Pediatric delirium and associated risk factors: a single-center prospective observational study.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 May;16(4):303-309. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000356.
8
Delirium screening anchored in child development: The Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium.
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Aug;13(4):1005-11. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000947. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
9
The pharmacologic management of delirium in children and adolescents.
Paediatr Drugs. 2014 Aug;16(4):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0078-0.
10
Management of pediatric delirium in critical illness: a practical update.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Mar;81(3):333-41. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验