a European Commission, Joint Research Centre , Ispra , Italy.
Nanotoxicology. 2019 Feb;13(1):100-118. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1506060. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
The use of non-testing strategies like read-across in the hazard assessment of chemicals and nanomaterials (NMs) is deemed essential to perform the safety assessment of all NMs in due time and at lower costs. The identification of physicochemical (PC) properties affecting the hazard potential of NMs is crucial, as it could enable to predict impacts from similar NMs and outcomes of similar assays, reducing the need for experimental (and in particular animal) testing. This manuscript presents a review of approaches and available case studies on the grouping of NMs to read-across hazard endpoints. We include in this review grouping frameworks aimed at identifying hazard classes depending on PC properties, hazard classification modules in control banding (CB) approaches, and computational methods that can be used for grouping for read-across. The existing frameworks and case studies are systematically reported. Relevant nanospecific PC properties taken into account in the reviewed frameworks to support grouping are shape and surface properties (surface chemistry or reactivity) and hazard classes are identified on the basis of biopersistence, morphology, reactivity, and solubility.
在化学品和纳米材料 (NMs) 的危害评估中使用非测试策略,如读通,被认为对于及时且以较低成本对所有 NM 进行安全评估至关重要。确定影响 NM 危害潜力的物理化学 (PC) 特性至关重要,因为它可以预测类似 NM 的影响和类似测定的结果,从而减少对实验(特别是动物)测试的需求。本文综述了用于 NM 读通危害终点分组的方法和现有案例研究。我们将本综述中的分组框架包括旨在根据 PC 特性确定危害类别、控制带 (CB) 方法中的危害分类模块以及可用于分组读通的计算方法。系统地报告了现有的框架和案例研究。在所审查的框架中,为支持分组而考虑的相关纳米特异性 PC 特性是形状和表面特性(表面化学或反应性),并根据生物持久性、形态、反应性和溶解度确定危害类别。