Suppr超能文献

《八种生物:22世纪的道德分类法》

Eight Kinds of Critters: A Moral Taxonomy for the Twenty-Second Century.

作者信息

Bess Michael

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2018 Sep 5;43(5):585-612. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhy018.

Abstract

Over the coming century, the accelerating advance of bioenhancement technologies, robotics, and artificial intelligence (AI) may significantly broaden the qualitative range of sentient and intelligent beings. This article proposes a taxonomy of such beings, ranging from modified animals to bioenhanced humans to advanced forms of robots and AI. It divides these diverse beings into three moral and legal categories-animals, persons, and presumed persons-describing the moral attributes and legal rights of each category. In so doing, the article sets forth a framework for extending the concept of personhood well beyond its current boundaries, assigning moral standing to a variety of biological and nonbiological beings. The author concludes that six of the eight subgroups of such beings deserve to be treated as persons or as if they were persons, with full consideration for their presumed interests, rights, obligations, and capabilities for ethically significant agency and patiency.

摘要

在接下来的一个世纪里,生物增强技术、机器人技术和人工智能(AI)的加速发展可能会显著拓宽有感知力和智能的生物的质量范围。本文提出了这样一类生物的分类法,从经过改造的动物到生物增强的人类,再到先进形式的机器人和人工智能。它将这些不同的生物分为三个道德和法律类别——动物、人以及准人,描述了每个类别的道德属性和法律权利。通过这样做,本文提出了一个框架,将人格概念扩展到远远超出其当前界限的范围,赋予各种生物和非生物以道德地位。作者得出结论,这类生物的八个子群体中的六个应该被视为人或被当作人来对待,要充分考虑到它们假定的利益、权利、义务以及在伦理上具有重要意义的行为能力和承受能力。

相似文献

1
Eight Kinds of Critters: A Moral Taxonomy for the Twenty-Second Century.
J Med Philos. 2018 Sep 5;43(5):585-612. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhy018.
2
Artificial Intelligence.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016 Apr;25(2):250-61. doi: 10.1017/S0963180115000559.
3
Intelligent robots must uphold human rights.
Nature. 2015 Mar 26;519(7544):391. doi: 10.1038/519391a.
5
More Human than Human.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jul;26(3):476-490. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116001158.
6
AIonAI: a humanitarian law of artificial intelligence and robotics.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Feb;21(1):29-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9513-9. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
7
To what do we have moral obligations and why? I.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 1;290(6482):1646-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6482.1646.
8
Artificial intelligence and robot responsibilities: innovating beyond rights.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):317-26. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9541-0. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
10
Is equal moral consideration really compatible with unequal moral status?
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010 Sep;20(3):251-76. doi: 10.1353/ken.2010.0004.

引用本文的文献

1
The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Review.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 9;27(4):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00331-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验