Suppr超能文献

杜塞尔多夫健康饮食强迫症量表(DOS)英文版的心理测量评估及美国学生样本中健康饮食强迫症的患病率

Psychometric evaluation of the English version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexie Scale (DOS) and the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among a U.S. student sample.

作者信息

Chard Chrissy A, Hilzendegen Carolin, Barthels Friederike, Stroebele-Benschop Nanette

机构信息

Colorado School of Public Health at Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1879, Sage Hall, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1879, USA.

University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Apr;24(2):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0570-6. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recently, the concept of orthorexia nervosa (ON) as a potential new variant of disordered eating behavior has gained popularity. However, published prevalence rates appear to be questionable given the lack of validity of the available questionnaires. The Düsseldorf Orthorexie Scale (DOS) is a validated questionnaire only available in German to measure orthorexic behavior.

METHODS

The DOS was translated into English using the back-translation process. Cronbach's alpha was used to establish internal consistency and an intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated to assess reliability. The Eating Habits Questionnaire (EHQ) was used to test construct validity and the Eating Disorders Inventory was used to test discriminant validity. Principal and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to test the factor structure. The sample consists of 384 university students in the U.S.

RESULTS

English (E)-DOS and EHQ were highly correlated (r = 0.76, p < .001) indicating very good construct validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient reached 0.88, indicating very good internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a poorly fitted one-factor model, but good results for the standardized coefficients for the 10 items ranging between 0.52 and 0.82 were found. According to the E-DOS, 8.0% of the students exceeded the preliminary cut-off score, while an additional 12.4% would be considered being at risk of developing ON.

CONCLUSIONS

The E-DOS appears to be a valid, reliable measure for assessing ON. The results revealed higher prevalence rates for orthorexic behavior among U.S. students compared to German students. Cultural aspects could play a role in those differences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Descriptive study, Level V.

摘要

目的

最近,作为饮食行为潜在新变体的正食症(ON)概念已受到广泛关注。然而,鉴于现有问卷缺乏效度,已公布的患病率似乎值得怀疑。杜塞尔多夫正食症量表(DOS)是一种经过验证的问卷,仅以德语提供,用于测量正食行为。

方法

采用回译法将DOS翻译成英语。使用克朗巴哈系数来建立内部一致性,并计算组内相关系数以评估信度。使用饮食习惯问卷(EHQ)来检验结构效度,使用饮食失调量表来检验区分效度。进行主成分分析和验证性因素分析以检验因素结构。样本包括384名美国大学生。

结果

英语(E)-DOS与EHQ高度相关(r = 0.76,p <.001),表明结构效度非常好。克朗巴哈系数达到0.88,表明内部一致性非常好。验证性因素分析显示单因素模型拟合不佳,但发现10个项目的标准化系数结果良好,范围在0.52至0.82之间。根据E-DOS,8.0%的学生超过了初步临界分数,另有12.4%的学生被认为有发展为正食症的风险。

结论

E-DOS似乎是评估正食症的有效、可靠工具。结果显示,与德国学生相比,美国学生中正食行为的患病率更高。文化因素可能在这些差异中起作用。

证据水平

描述性研究,五级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验