Talebi Ghadam Ali, Saadat Payam, Javadian Yahya, Taghipour Mohammad
Mobility Impairment Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Clinical Research Development Unit of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Caspian J Intern Med. 2018 Summer;9(3):283-289. doi: 10.22088/cjim.9.3.283.
Generally, conservative interventions including physiotherapy modalities and manual therapy have been recommended in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), but this subject has not been studied in diabetic patients with CTS. Therefore the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of manual therapy on diabetic patients with CTS.
Thirty diabetic patients with CTS were randomly divided into two equal groups: modality group and manual therapy group. Participants in the modality group received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and therapeutic ultrasound (US) and patients in the manual therapy group received manual techniques for the median nerve and its surrounding structures. Interventions were applied 3 times weekly for 4 weeks in both groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS), symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS) and median neurodynamic test (MNT) were evaluated before and after the interventions in both groups. Paired t-test and independent t-test were used for statistical analysis.
Paired t-test revealed that all of the outcome measures had a significant change in the manual therapy group, whereas only the VAS and SSS changed significantly in the modality group at the end of 4 weeks. Independent t-test showed that the variables of SSS, FSS and MNT in the manual therapy group improved significantly greater than the modality group.
Manual therapy techniques applied to mechanical interface of the median nerve and nerve mobilization possess more appropriate and valuable effects on hand difficulties than modalities in diabetic patients with CTS.
一般来说,在腕管综合征(CTS)的治疗中,推荐采用包括物理治疗方式和手法治疗在内的保守干预措施,但尚未对糖尿病合并CTS患者进行过此项研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨手法治疗对糖尿病合并CTS患者的影响。
30例糖尿病合并CTS患者被随机分为两组,每组15例:理疗组和手法治疗组。理疗组患者接受经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和超声治疗(US),手法治疗组患者接受针对正中神经及其周围结构的手法治疗。两组均每周进行3次干预,持续4周。在干预前后,对两组患者进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)、症状严重程度量表(SSS)、功能状态量表(FSS)和正中神经动力试验(MNT)评估。采用配对t检验和独立t检验进行统计分析。
配对t检验显示,手法治疗组所有的结局指标均有显著变化,而理疗组在4周结束时仅VAS和SSS有显著变化。独立t检验表明,手法治疗组的SSS、FSS和MNT变量改善程度显著大于理疗组。
对于糖尿病合并CTS患者,应用于正中神经机械界面和神经松动的手法治疗技术比理疗方式对手部功能障碍具有更合适且更有价值的疗效。