Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS at Yale University.
Montefiore Medical Center.
J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;47(2):371-384. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22126. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Identity abuse (IA) comprises a set of abuse tactics that exploit discriminatory systems including homophobia, biphobia, and transphobia (Tesch & Berkerian, 2015). This study examined the factorial validity of the IA Scale (Woulfe & Goodman, 2018) with a large independent sample of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals. Participants included 1,049 LGBTQ-identified participants (M = 27.3, 71.9% White, 52.6% cisgender women, and 18.7% as other nonheterosexual identity in their sexual orientation), recruited through listservs. Participants completed an online survey measuring past-year and adult exposure to identity, physical, and psychological abuse. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement model had good fit to the data, and strong factor loadings were found across the seven items, confirming a unidimensional factor structure. Findings demonstrate the IA Scale's validity and reliability, supporting its use to assess the frequency of IA tactics experienced within intimate partnerships among LGBTQ individuals.
身份滥用(IA)包括一系列利用包括恐同、双性恋恐惧症和跨性别恐惧症在内的歧视性系统的滥用策略(Tesch & Berkerian,2015)。本研究使用大量独立的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ)个体样本,检验了 IA 量表(Woulfe & Goodman,2018)的因子有效性。参与者包括 1049 名 LGBTQ 认同者(M = 27.3,71.9%为白人,52.6%为顺性别女性,18.7%为其他非异性恋身份的性取向),通过名录招募。参与者完成了一项在线调查,调查他们过去一年和成年后在身份、身体和心理方面受到的虐待。验证性因素分析表明,测量模型与数据具有良好的拟合度,七个项目的因子负荷均较强,证实了单一维度的因子结构。研究结果表明,IA 量表具有有效性和可靠性,支持其在评估 LGBTQ 个体亲密关系中经历的 IA 策略频率方面的使用。