Suppr超能文献

利用观察性数据进行心脏骤停研究的伦理问题:叙述性综述。

Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review.

机构信息

Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2018 Sep 13;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2153-3.

Abstract

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) accounts for half of all cardiac deaths in Europe. In recent years, large-scale SCA registries have been set up to enable observational studies into risk factors and the effect of treatment approaches. The increasing scale and variety of data sources, coupled with the implementation of a new European data protection legal framework, causes researchers to struggle with how to handle these 'big data'. Data protection in the SCA setting is especially complex since patients become at least temporarily incapacitated, and are thus unable to provide prospective informed consent, and because the majority of patients do not survive. A narrative review employing a systematic literature search was conducted to thematically analyse ethical aspects of non-interventional emergency medicine and critical care research. Although the identified issues may apply to a wider patient population, we describe them within the context of SCA research. Potential harms were found to include: privacy breaches, genetic discrimination and issues associated with the disclosure of individual findings, study design and application of research results. Measures proposed to mitigate harms were: alternative informed consent models including deferred or waived consent and data governance approaches promoting data security, responsible sharing and public engagement. The themes identified in this study may serve as a basis for a much-needed ethical framework regarding research with data from patients with acute and critical illness such as SCA.

摘要

心脏性骤停(SCA)占欧洲所有心脏性死亡的一半。近年来,已经建立了大规模的 SCA 登记处,以便能够对危险因素和治疗方法的效果进行观察性研究。不断增加的规模和数据源的多样性,加上新的欧洲数据保护法律框架的实施,使得研究人员难以处理这些“大数据”。SCA 环境中的数据保护尤其复杂,因为患者至少会暂时丧失能力,因此无法提供前瞻性的知情同意,而且大多数患者无法存活。本研究采用系统文献检索进行叙述性综述,以对非介入性急诊医学和重症监护研究的伦理方面进行主题分析。尽管已确定的问题可能适用于更广泛的患者群体,但我们将其描述为 SCA 研究的背景。潜在的危害包括:侵犯隐私、遗传歧视以及与个体研究结果的披露、研究设计和应用相关的问题。为减轻危害而提出的措施包括:替代的知情同意模式,包括延期或豁免同意,以及促进数据安全、负责任的共享和公众参与的数据治理方法。本研究确定的主题可以作为一个急需的关于 SCA 等急性和危重病患者数据研究的伦理框架的基础。

相似文献

1
Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review.
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 13;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2153-3.
2
Data-driven sudden cardiac arrest research in Europe: Experts' perspectives on ethical challenges and governance strategies.
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 16;15:100414. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100414. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 28;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00576-9.
4
The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):303-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2. Epub 2015 May 23.
5
Waiver of informed consent in pediatric resuscitation research: a systematic review.
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;20(8):822-34. doi: 10.1111/acem.12180.
6
Too much information: visual research ethics in the age of wearable cameras.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;49(2):309-22. doi: 10.1007/s12124-014-9289-8.
7
Ethical issues in couple and family research.
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):157-67. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.157.
8
Determinants of occurrence and survival after sudden cardiac arrest-A European perspective: The ESCAPE-NET project.
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Consent and confidentiality in the light of recent demands for data sharing.
Biom J. 2017 Mar;59(2):240-250. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500044. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis.
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):529-538. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00734-7. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research progress and challenges in Lithuania.
Resusc Plus. 2024 May 30;19:100664. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100664. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Current Trends in Biohumoral Screening for the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 29;60(3):418. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030418.
4
Rationale and design of the BECA project: Smartwatch-based activation of the chain of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 9;17:100576. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100576. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Data-driven sudden cardiac arrest research in Europe: Experts' perspectives on ethical challenges and governance strategies.
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 16;15:100414. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100414. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Towards trust-based governance of health data research.
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Jun;26(2):185-200. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10134-8. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
8
Individual-level income and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival in men and women.
Open Heart. 2022 Aug;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002044.
10
[Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):720-749. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00888-8. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of occurrence and survival after sudden cardiac arrest-A European perspective: The ESCAPE-NET project.
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance.
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):501-513. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9809-6. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Better Late Than Never? Deferred Consent for Minimal Risk Research in the ICU.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1571-1572. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002557.
4
The value of pragmatic and observational studies in health care and public health.
Pragmat Obs Res. 2017 May 12;8:49-55. doi: 10.2147/POR.S137701. eCollection 2017.
5
Sudden Cardiac Arrest Risk Assessment: Population Science and the Individual Risk Mandate.
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;2(6):689-694. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0266.
6
The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Jan 3;11:709. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.709. eCollection 2017.
8
Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):655-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1507092.
9
Making sense of big data in health research: Towards an EU action plan.
Genome Med. 2016 Jun 23;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0323-y.
10
The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov;24(11):1553-1558. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.52. Epub 2016 May 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验