Puah Ken Lee, Chong Hwei Chi, Foo Leon Siang Shen, Lo Ngai-Nung, Yeo Seng-Jin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Feb 7;2(2):e084. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00084. eCollection 2018 Feb.
Constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses are commonly used in difficult primary total knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty. We postulate that the use of CCK prostheses in primary knee arthroplasty may result in decreased range of motion but with better patient-reported functional scores compared with primary posterior stabilized (PS) knee prostheses because of increased varus and valgus stability from increased constraint.
We conducted a case-control study using prospectively collected data on functional outcome scores and range of motion preoperatively and at 6 months and at 2 years. Thirty-eight patients with primary CCK arthroplasty were matched with 38 patients with primary PS knee arthroplasty treated by a single surgeon. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Analysis was done using the independent -test.
Total 76 patients with 61 (80.3%) female patients, 30 (39.5%) left knees, and 9 (11.8%) valgus knees. There was no significant difference in preoperative age (CCK arthroplasty 70.7 ± 6.0 years versus PS knee arthroplasty 68.5 ± 5.2 years; < 0.085), body mass index (27.2 ± 4.4 versus 26.3 ± 5.2; < 0.44), Oxford Knee Score (35.8 ± 7.8 versus 36.0 ± 7.6; < 0.92), and Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form (SF-36) scores and knee extension (8.0° ± 6.7° versus 7.7° ± 7.6°; < 0.84). There was no significant difference in preoperative knee flexion (106.0° ± 22.9° versus 117.3° ± 20.1°; < 0.026). There was no significant difference in 6-month knee extension (4.5° ± 6.8° versus 4.1° ± 4.5°; < 0.80), knee flexion (110.5° ± 15.8° versus 110.9° ± 15.5°; < 0.92), Oxford Knee Score (18.9° ± 3.4° versus 20.1° ± 5.3°; < 0.27), and SF-36 scores. There was no significant difference in 2-year knee extension (1.8° ± 5.7° versus 1.5° ± 4.0°; < 0.82), knee flexion (111.3° ± 13.6° versus 115.0° ± 16.5°; < 0.30), Oxford Knee Score (18.5° ± 3.7° versus 18.2° ± 4.2°; < 0.77), and SF-36 scores.
The use of CCK prostheses in primary knee arthroplasty gives similar clinical and functional outcomes at 2 years as those of PS knee prostheses, despite increased constraint.
受限髁膝关节(CCK)假体常用于困难的初次全膝关节置换术和全膝关节置换翻修术。我们推测,在初次膝关节置换术中使用CCK假体可能会导致活动范围减小,但与初次后稳定型(PS)膝关节假体相比,患者报告的功能评分可能更好,这是因为增加的限制提高了内翻和外翻稳定性。
我们进行了一项病例对照研究,前瞻性收集术前、6个月和2年时的功能结局评分及活动范围数据。38例行初次CCK置换术的患者与38例由同一位外科医生治疗的初次PS膝关节置换术患者进行匹配。获得了机构审查委员会的批准。采用独立样本t检验进行分析。
共有76例患者,其中61例(80.3%)为女性患者,30例(39.5%)为左膝,9例(11.8%)为外翻膝。术前年龄(CCK置换术70.7±6.0岁,PS膝关节置换术68.5±5.2岁;P<0.085)、体重指数(27.2±4.4与26.3±5.2;P<0.44)、牛津膝关节评分(35.8±7.8与36.0±7.6;P<0.92)、医学结局研究简明健康调查(SF - 36)评分及膝关节伸展度(8.0°±6.7°与7.7°±7.6°;P<0.84)无显著差异。术前膝关节屈曲度有显著差异(106.0°±22.9°与117.3°±20.1°;P<0.026)。6个月时膝关节伸展度(4.5°±6.8°与4.1°±4.5°;P<0.80)、膝关节屈曲度(110.5°±15.8°与110.9°±15.5°;P<0.92)、牛津膝关节评分(18.9°±3.4°与20.1°±5.3°;P<0.27)及SF - 36评分无显著差异。2年时膝关节伸展度(1.8°±5.7°与1.5°±4.0°;P<0.82)、膝关节屈曲度(111.3°±13.6°与115.0°±16.5°;P<0.30)、牛津膝关节评分(18.5°±3.7°与18.2°±4.2°;P<0.77)及SF - 36评分无显著差异。
在初次膝关节置换术中使用CCK假体,尽管限制增加,但在2年时的临床和功能结局与PS膝关节假体相似。