Suppr超能文献

复发转移性与初发性转移性非小细胞肺癌的临床特征和结局比较。

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Relapsed Versus De Novo Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine.

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;42(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000483.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between relapsed and de novo metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all NSCLC diagnoses between January 1999 and December 2013 in the institutional Glans-Look Lung Cancer Database, which contains demographic, clinical, pathologic, treatment, and outcome information. Patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] eighth edition, stage IV), the "de novo" cohort, were compared with the "relapsed" cohort, consisting of patients diagnosed with early stage disease (stage I/II) undergoing curative intent treatment and subsequently experiencing metastatic relapse. Survival analysis, along with univariate and multivariable analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 185 relapsed and 3039 de novo patients were identified. Significantly different patterns of smoking history, histology, systemic therapy use, and disease extent were observed between the relapsed and de novo cohorts. Median overall survival from time of metastasis was significantly longer in relapsed than in de novo disease (8.9 vs. 3.7 mo, P<0.001). Relapsed patients demonstrated significant improvements in outcomes over time. In multivariate analysis, de novo metastatic disease continued to bode a worse prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.4) as did male sex (HR, 1.2), never-smoking history (HR, 1.2), and presence of extrapulmonary metastases (HR, 1.3). Systemic therapy receipt conferred better outcome (HR, 0.4), although the impact of relapsed versus de novo disease on outcomes persisted regardless of systemic therapy receipt.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapsed and de novo patients represent significantly different subpopulations within metastatic NSCLC with the latter exhibiting poorer survival. This information facilitates discussions about prognosis with patients and supports screening initiatives aimed at reducing de novo disease.

摘要

目的

比较复发性和初发性转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床特征和结局。

材料和方法

我们回顾了 1999 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间机构 Glans-Look 肺癌数据库中的所有 NSCLC 诊断,该数据库包含人口统计学、临床、病理学、治疗和结局信息。初诊时即发生远处转移(美国癌症联合委员会 [AJCC] 第八版,IV 期)的患者归入“初发性”队列,与“复发性”队列进行比较,后者由接受根治性治疗且随后发生转移性复发的早期疾病(I/II 期)患者组成。进行了生存分析以及单变量和多变量分析。

结果

共确定了 185 例复发性和 3039 例初发性患者。在复发性和初发性队列之间观察到吸烟史、组织学、全身治疗使用和疾病范围的明显不同模式。从转移时间开始的中位总生存期在复发性疾病中明显长于初发性疾病(8.9 与 3.7 个月,P<0.001)。复发性患者的结局随着时间的推移有显著改善。多变量分析显示,初发性转移性疾病仍然预示着预后更差(调整后的危险比 [HR],1.4),男性(HR,1.2)、从不吸烟史(HR,1.2)和存在肺外转移(HR,1.3)也是如此。接受全身治疗与更好的结局相关(HR,0.4),但无论是否接受全身治疗,复发性与初发性疾病对结局的影响仍然存在。

结论

复发性和初发性转移性 NSCLC 患者代表了具有显著不同特征的亚群,后者的生存较差。这些信息有助于与患者讨论预后,并支持旨在减少初发性疾病的筛查计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验