van Rijn Suzanne F, Zwerus Elisa L, Koenraadt Koen Lm, Jacobs Wilco Ch, van den Bekerom Michel Pj, Eygendaal Denise
Orthopedic Surgery Department, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Oct;10(4):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1758573218774326. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
The universal goniometer is a simple measuring tool. With this review we aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the universal goniometer in measurements of the adults' elbow.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed and our study protocol was published online at PROSPERO. A literature search was conducted on relevant studies. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) scoring system.
Out of 697 studies yielded from our literature search, 12 were included. Six studies were rated as high quality. The intrarater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.45 to 0.99, the interrater reliability ranged from intraclass correlation coefficient 0.53-0.97. One study providing instructions on goniometric alignment did not find a difference in expert versus non-expert examiners. Another study in which examiners were not instructed found a higher interrater reliability in expert examiners. One study investigating the validity of the goniometer in elbow measurements found a maximum standard error of the mean of 11.5° for total range of motion.
Overall, the studies showed high intra- and interrater reliability of the universal goniometer. The reliability of the universal goniometer in non-expert examiners can be increased by clear instructions on goniometric alignment.
通用测角仪是一种简单的测量工具。通过本综述,我们旨在研究通用测角仪在测量成人肘部时的可靠性和有效性。
遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,我们的研究方案已在PROSPERO上在线发表。对相关研究进行了文献检索。使用诊断可靠性质量评估(QAREL)评分系统评估方法学质量。
在我们的文献检索得出的697项研究中,纳入了12项。六项研究被评为高质量。评估者内信度组内相关系数范围为0.45至0.99,评估者间信度组内相关系数范围为0.53 - 0.97。一项提供测角仪对准说明的研究未发现专家与非专家检查者之间存在差异。另一项未对检查者进行指导的研究发现专家检查者的评估者间信度更高。一项研究测角仪在肘部测量中的有效性的研究发现,总活动范围的平均最大标准误差为11.5°。
总体而言,研究表明通用测角仪具有较高的评估者内和评估者间信度。通过对测角仪对准进行清晰说明,可以提高通用测角仪在非专家检查者中的可靠性。