Suppr超能文献

微创治疗拇外翻:当前手术技术的系统评价。

Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical techniques.

机构信息

Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Laboratory of Arthroscopic and Surgical Anatomy, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics (Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):625-637. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4138-x. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the available literature on minimally invasive surgical (MIS) treatment for hallux valgus and to provide an overview of the different surgical techniques.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature available in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database was performed including studies from January 2001 to 1 January 2018. The radiological outcomes (hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA)), complication rates, and clinical outcome scores were evaluated. The MINORS scale was used to assess the methodological quality of included articles.

RESULTS

Of 278 reviewed articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported on the results of 2279 procedures in 1762 patients. The surgical techniques were divided into five categories: the Bosch technique, MIS Chevron-Akin, Reverdin-Isham procedure, Endolog system, and techniques involving distal soft tissue release and fixation. Results regarding radiological correction, clinical outcomes, and complication rate varied widely.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies included were of too little level of evidence to allow for data pooling or meta-analysis. There were too few studies on each surgical technique category to assess whether one is more effective than the rest. However, there is some evidence that the Chevron and Akin showed the most potential for improvement of the HVA and the Endolog for the IMA. An overall complication rate of 13% was obtained among all included studies. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials, utilizing validated outcome measures, blinded assessors, and long-term follow up are needed to assess the efficacy of MIS techniques.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统评价微创外科(MIS)治疗拇外翻的现有文献,并概述不同的手术技术。

方法

对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中 2001 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间的文献进行系统评价。评估了放射学结果(拇外翻角(HVA)、跖骨间角(IMA))、并发症发生率和临床结果评分。采用 MINORS 量表评估纳入文章的方法学质量。

结果

在 278 篇综述文章中,有 23 篇符合纳入标准。纳入的研究报告了 1762 名患者的 2279 例手术结果。手术技术分为五类:Bosch 技术、MIS Chevron-Akin、Reverdin-Isham 手术、Endolog 系统以及涉及远端软组织松解和固定的技术。关于放射学矫正、临床结果和并发症发生率的结果差异很大。

结论

纳入的研究证据水平太低,无法进行数据合并或荟萃分析。每个手术技术类别都缺乏足够的研究来评估哪种技术更有效。然而,有一些证据表明 Chevron 和 Akin 最有潜力改善 HVA,Endolog 最有潜力改善 IMA。所有纳入研究的总体并发症发生率为 13%。需要进行适当的、有统计学意义的随机对照试验,使用验证有效的结果评估方法、盲法评估和长期随访,以评估 MIS 技术的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验