Hamer Davidson H, MacLeod William B, Chen Lin H, Hochberg Natasha S, Kogelman Laura, Karchmer Adolf W, Ooi Winnie W, Benoit Christine, Wilson Mary E, Jentes Emily S, Barnett Elizabeth D
Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr 28;1(1):78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2017.04.001. eCollection 2017 Jul.
To inform future interventions for advising travelers.
We prospectively collected data on travelers seen at the Boston Area Travel Medicine Network, a Boston area research collaboration of 5 travel medicine clinics. Data from 15,440 travelers were collected from March 1, 2008, through July 31, 2010. We compared traveler and trip characteristics and differences in demographic characteristics and travel plans across the 5 clinics, including an analysis of pretravel preparations for certain high-risk destinations.
More than half of the 15,440 travelers were female (8730 [56.5]), and 72.4% (10,528 of 14,545) were white; the median age was 34 years, and 29.4% of travelers (3077 of 10,483) were seen less than 2 weeks before their departure date. Substantial variation in racial background, purpose of travel, and destination risk existed across the 5 clinics. For example, the proportion of travelers visiting friends and relatives ranged from 7.6% (184 of 2436) to 39.0% (1029 of 2639) (18.7% [2876 of 15,360] overall), and the percentage of travelers to areas with malaria risk ranged from 23.7% (333 of 1403) to 52.0% (1306 of 2512). Although most clinics were likely to have prescribed certain vaccines for high-risk destinations (eg, yellow fever for Ghana travel), there was wide variability in influenza vaccine use for China travel.
Substantial differences in clinic populations can occur within a single metropolitan area, highlighting why individual physicians and travel clinics need to understand the specific needs of the travelers they serve in addition to general travel medicine.
为未来为旅行者提供建议的干预措施提供信息。
我们前瞻性地收集了在波士顿地区旅行医学网络就诊的旅行者的数据,该网络是波士顿地区5家旅行医学诊所的研究合作项目。从2008年3月1日至2010年7月31日收集了15440名旅行者的数据。我们比较了旅行者和旅行特征以及5家诊所之间人口统计学特征和旅行计划的差异,包括对某些高风险目的地的旅行前准备情况进行分析。
15440名旅行者中超过一半为女性(8730名[56.5%]),72.4%(14545名中的10528名)为白人;年龄中位数为34岁,29.4%的旅行者(10483名中的3077名)在出发日期前不到2周就诊。5家诊所的种族背景、旅行目的和目的地风险存在很大差异。例如,探访朋友和亲戚的旅行者比例从7.6%(2436名中的184名)到39.0%(2639名中的1029名)不等(总体为18.7%[15360名中的2876名]),前往有疟疾风险地区的旅行者百分比从23.7%(1403名中的333名)到52.0%(2512名中的1306名)不等。尽管大多数诊所可能会为高风险目的地开具某些疫苗(例如,前往加纳旅行的黄热病疫苗),但前往中国旅行时流感疫苗的使用差异很大。
在单个大都市地区,诊所人群可能存在很大差异,这凸显了为什么个体医生和旅行诊所除了了解一般旅行医学外,还需要了解他们所服务的旅行者的具体需求。