Hanson Kristine T, Zalewski Nicholas L, Hocker Sara E, Caselli Richard J, Habermann Elizabeth B, Thiels Cornelius A
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018 May 24;2(2):137-147. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.03.007. eCollection 2018 Jun.
To assess variation in patient-reported experience in inpatient neurology patients.
We retrospectively identified 1045 patients 18 years and older admitted to a neurology service and discharged from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2016, who completed Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the associations of patient factors with HCAHPS measures. Key driver analysis identified associations between HCAHPS measures and the Global score (combination of 0-10 hospital rating and likelihood to recommend). Multivariable logistic regression compared HCAHPS scores between neurology patients and those admitted to a neurosurgery (n=2190) or internal medicine (n=3401) service during the same period.
Among patients admitted to a neurology service, overall (summary) scores did not vary significantly by diagnosis after adjustment for age, education, and overall health, but patients with neurologic diagnoses other than stroke, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative disease were more likely to report lower Pain Management scores compared with patients with cancer. Key driver analysis showed Care Transition scores as drivers of the Global score. After adjustment, general internal medicine service patients were more likely to report low Summary scores and neurosurgery service patients were significantly less likely to report low Summary scores compared with neurology service patients.
Efforts to improve how neurology patients experience their care should be aimed at targeting patients' perceptions of pain management, and improving care transitions is an important first-priority target for improvement. This analysis may help other institutions improve hospital rating, value-based payments, and patient-centered outcomes.
评估住院神经内科患者报告的就医体验差异。
我们回顾性确定了1045名18岁及以上入住神经内科且于2013年1月1日至2016年9月30日期间出院的患者,这些患者完成了医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查。多变量逻辑回归评估了患者因素与HCAHPS指标之间的关联。关键驱动因素分析确定了HCAHPS指标与总体评分(0至10分的医院评级与推荐可能性的组合)之间的关联。多变量逻辑回归比较了神经内科患者与同期入住神经外科(n = 2190)或内科(n = 3401)的患者的HCAHPS评分。
在入住神经内科的患者中,在对年龄、教育程度和总体健康状况进行调整后,总体(汇总)评分在诊断方面没有显著差异,但与癌症患者相比,患有中风、癫痫和神经退行性疾病以外的神经系统疾病诊断的患者更有可能报告较低的疼痛管理评分。关键驱动因素分析显示护理过渡评分是总体评分的驱动因素。调整后,与神经内科患者相比,普通内科服务患者更有可能报告低汇总评分,而神经外科服务患者报告低汇总评分的可能性显著较低。
改善神经内科患者就医体验的努力应旨在针对患者对疼痛管理的认知,改善护理过渡是改善的重要首要目标。该分析可能有助于其他机构提高医院评级、基于价值的支付和以患者为中心的结果。