Smith Sophia K, Loscalzo Matthew, Mayer Carole, Rosenstein Donald L
From the Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC; Sheri & Les Biller Patient and Family Resource Center, Department of Supportive Care Medicine, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Supportive Care Oncology Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:813-821. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201307.
The field of psychosocial oncology is a young discipline with a rapidly expanding evidence base. Over the past few decades, several lines of research have established that psychosocial problems, such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, fatigue, sexual dysfunction, and cognitive complaints, are common and consequential in patients with cancer. The word "distress" was chosen deliberately to capture a broad concept; consequently, distress screening is meant to function as an initial step in the more targeted evaluation of the source(s) of the patient's distress. In 2015, the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer mandated psychosocial distress screening as part of their accreditation process. Similar screening requirements are in place internationally, including in Canada, where screening for distress is endorsed as the sixth vital sign and a standard of care that must be met by any Canadian health care organization providing cancer services that seeks to be accredited. Over the past few years, cancer centers around the world have been exploring optimum ways to implement and evaluate distress screening initiatives. This paper presents three approaches to distress screening implementation: (1) a model that incorporates the importance of shared values, perceived benefits, and relevant outcomes in the implementation of distress management protocols; (2) a Canadian knowledge translation application to distress screening, including triage considerations and interventions; and (3) a novel approach to distress management via the use of a mobile application to manage post-traumatic stress symptoms. In closing, future opportunities and challenges associated with the emergence of technology will be discussed.
心理社会肿瘤学领域是一门年轻的学科,其证据基础正在迅速扩大。在过去几十年里,多项研究表明,心理社会问题,如焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍、疲劳、性功能障碍和认知障碍,在癌症患者中很常见且后果严重。特意选用“困扰”一词来涵盖一个宽泛的概念;因此,困扰筛查旨在作为对患者困扰来源进行更有针对性评估的第一步。2015年,美国外科医师学会癌症委员会将心理社会困扰筛查作为其认证过程的一部分。国际上也有类似的筛查要求,包括在加拿大,困扰筛查被认可为第六生命体征以及任何寻求认证的提供癌症服务的加拿大医疗机构必须达到的护理标准。在过去几年里,世界各地的癌症中心一直在探索实施和评估困扰筛查举措的最佳方法。本文介绍了三种困扰筛查实施方法:(1)一种在实施困扰管理方案时纳入共同价值观、感知益处和相关结果重要性的模式;(2)一种加拿大用于困扰筛查的知识转化应用,包括分诊考虑因素和干预措施;(3)一种通过使用移动应用程序管理创伤后应激症状来进行困扰管理的新方法。最后,将讨论与技术出现相关的未来机遇和挑战。