School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;31(6):456-461. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000450.
Internet prevention of eating disorders is a relatively new field that is expanding rapidly. We review randomized controlled trial designs examining the efficacy of Internet prevention in eating disorders that have emerged from 2016.
Our literature search identified five studies that used randomized controlled trial designs to examine the efficacy of Internet prevention in eating disorders. All of the studies represented indicated prevention, that is, young women who have body image concerns. Three specific approaches were examined: media literacy, cognitive dissonance, and cognitive behavior therapy. All studies indicated significantly more impact of the intervention than a control condition, with between group effect sizes at follow-up ranging from 0.24 to 0.42.
Although Internet interventions for eating disorders may be less effective than face-to-face interventions, and attrition increases when populations are used that reflect real-world usage, these interventions have an important role in a stepped-care approach. Future research should make direct comparisons of different Internet programs with a view to helping us understand who will gain most benefit out of which approach, including who requires moderated Internet approaches and who does not.
互联网预防饮食失调是一个相对较新且快速发展的领域。我们综述了 2016 年以来出现的使用随机对照试验设计来检验互联网预防饮食失调有效性的研究。
我们的文献检索确定了五项使用随机对照试验设计来检验互联网预防饮食失调有效性的研究。所有研究均代表了意向性预防,即针对有身体意象问题的年轻女性。研究检验了三种具体方法:媒体素养、认知失调和认知行为疗法。所有研究均表明干预的效果明显优于对照组,随访时的组间效应大小范围为 0.24 至 0.42。
尽管互联网干预饮食失调的效果可能不如面对面干预,但当使用反映现实世界使用情况的人群时,失访率会增加,这些干预在阶梯式护理方法中具有重要作用。未来的研究应直接比较不同的互联网方案,以期帮助我们了解哪些人最能从哪种方法中获益,包括谁需要适度的互联网方法,谁不需要。