Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Haematologica. 2019 Jan;104(1):189-196. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.193441. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
The application of machine learning in medicine has been productive in multiple fields, but has not previously been applied to analyze the complexity of organ involvement by chronic graft--host disease. Chronic graft--host disease is classified by an overall composite score as mild, moderate or severe, which may overlook clinically relevant patterns in organ involvement. Here we applied a novel computational approach to chronic graft--host disease with the goal of identifying phenotypic groups based on the subcomponents of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. Computational analysis revealed seven distinct groups of patients with contrasting clinical risks. The high-risk group had an inferior overall survival compared to the low-risk group (hazard ratio 2.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.36-3.68), an effect that was independent of graft--host disease severity as measured by the National Institutes of Health criteria. To test clinical applicability, knowledge was translated into a simplified clinical prognostic decision tree. Groups identified by the decision tree also stratified outcomes and closely matched those from the original analysis. Patients in the high- and intermediate-risk decision-tree groups had significantly shorter overall survival than those in the low-risk group (hazard ratio 2.79; 95% confidence interval: 1.58-4.91 and hazard ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-3.01, respectively). Machine learning and other computational analyses may better reveal biomarkers and stratify risk than the current approach based on cumulative severity. This approach could now be explored in other disease models with complex clinical phenotypes. External validation must be completed prior to clinical application. Ultimately, this approach has the potential to reveal distinct pathophysiological mechanisms that may underlie clusters. .
机器学习在医学中的应用在多个领域都取得了丰硕的成果,但之前尚未应用于分析慢性移植物抗宿主病的器官受累的复杂性。慢性移植物抗宿主病通过整体综合评分分为轻度、中度或重度,但可能会忽略器官受累的临床相关模式。在这里,我们应用了一种新的计算方法来分析慢性移植物抗宿主病,旨在根据 NIH 共识标准的亚组分确定基于表型的组。计算分析显示,患者有七个截然不同的组,具有不同的临床风险。与低风险组相比,高风险组的总体生存率较低(危险比 2.24;95%置信区间:1.36-3.68),这种影响独立于 NIH 标准测量的移植物抗宿主病严重程度。为了测试临床适用性,知识被转化为简化的临床预后决策树。决策树确定的组也对结果进行了分层,与原始分析非常匹配。高风险和中风险决策树组的患者的总生存率明显短于低风险组(危险比 2.79;95%置信区间:1.58-4.91 和危险比 1.78;95%置信区间:1.06-3.01)。机器学习和其他计算分析可能比基于累积严重程度的当前方法更好地揭示生物标志物和分层风险。这种方法现在可以在其他具有复杂临床表型的疾病模型中进行探索。在临床应用之前必须完成外部验证。最终,这种方法有可能揭示潜在聚类的不同病理生理机制。