Suppr超能文献

学术与健康教育相结合预防青少年身体攻击和暴力:系统评价、叙述性综合和干预成分分析。

Integration of academic and health education for the prevention of physical aggression and violence in young people: systematic review, narrative synthesis and intervention components analysis.

机构信息

DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 21;8(9):e020793. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020793.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review evidence on the effectiveness of interventions including integration of academic and health education for reducing physical aggression and violence, and describe the content of these interventions.

DATA SOURCES

Between November and December 2015, we searched 19 databases and 32 websites and consulted key experts in the field. We updated our search in February 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised trials of school-based interventions integrating academic and health education in students aged 4-18 and not targeted at health-related subpopulations (eg, learning or developmental difficulties). We included evaluations reporting a measure of interpersonal violence or aggression.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently in duplicate, interventions were analysed to understand similarities and differences and outcomes were narratively synthesised by key stage (KS).

RESULTS

We included 13 evaluations of 10 interventions reported in 20 papers. Interventions included either full or partial integration, incorporated a variety of domains beyond the classroom, and used literature, local development or linking of study skills and health promoting skills. Evidence was concentrated in KS2, with few evaluations in KS3 or KS4, and evaluations had few consistent effects; evaluations in KS3 and KS4 did not suggest effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

Integration of academic and health education may be a promising approach, but more evidence is needed. Future research should consider the 'lifecourse' aspects of these interventions; that is, do they have a longitudinal effect? Evaluations did not shed light on the value of different approaches to integration.

摘要

目的

系统评价包括学术和健康教育整合在内的干预措施在减少身体攻击和暴力方面的有效性证据,并描述这些干预措施的内容。

资料来源

2015 年 11 月至 12 月,我们检索了 19 个数据库和 32 个网站,并咨询了该领域的关键专家。我们于 2018 年 2 月更新了检索。

纳入标准

我们纳入了针对 4-18 岁学生的基于学校的干预措施,这些干预措施整合了学术和健康教育,但不针对与健康相关的亚人群(例如学习或发育困难)。我们纳入了报告人际暴力或攻击措施的评估。

资料提取和分析

数据由两人独立提取,对干预措施进行分析以了解相似点和不同点,并按关键阶段(KS)进行叙述性综合。

结果

我们纳入了 20 篇论文中报告的 13 项 10 项干预措施的评估结果。干预措施包括全部或部分整合,纳入了课堂以外的多种领域,并使用了文学、本地发展或联系学习技能和促进健康的技能。证据主要集中在 KS2,KS3 或 KS4 评估较少,且评估结果不一致;KS3 和 KS4 的评估并未表明干预的有效性。

讨论

学术和健康教育的整合可能是一种很有前途的方法,但需要更多的证据。未来的研究应考虑这些干预措施的“生命历程”方面;也就是说,它们是否具有纵向效果?评估结果并未阐明整合不同方法的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/6157571/962e4b730b5c/bmjopen-2017-020793f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验