Howard Anna, Kerr Julia, McLain Monica, Modlin Jessie
St Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, ID, USA.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Oct;25(7):1570-1575. doi: 10.1177/1078155218799853. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Oral chemotherapy agents are being prescribed more frequently in many cancer types. In-office dispensing of oral chemotherapy agents has demonstrated clinical benefits and also shown financial benefit to third-party payers. A previous publication estimated over $200,000 in cost savings annually from in-office dispensing solely from medications returned to stock for credit. However, pharmacists in the in-office setting perform many other interventions that may affect financial outcomes.
Assess financial impact of oral chemotherapy in-office dispensing by a clinic-based oral chemotherapy program serving five outpatient cancer centers in Southern Idaho. Outcomes include calculated monetary waste and cost avoidance of oral chemotherapy prescriptions from in-office dispensing and mail-order pharmacies.
Prescriptions received by the clinic-based oral chemotherapy program for filling through in-office dispensing and mail-order pharmacies were monitored for monetary waste and cost avoidance events from December 2016 through May 2017. Information was collected on the number of returned medications, therapy discontinuations, and dose adjustments. Monetary outcomes were calculated using average wholesale price.
During the six-month evaluation, prescriptions filled through in-office dispensing had a total cost avoidance of $1,020,193 ( = 154) and total waste of $154,985 ( = 36) resulting in an estimated net cost avoidance annually of $1,730,416. Prescriptions filled through mail-order had a total cost avoidance of $20,497 ( = 4) and a total waste of $80,394 ( = 15) resulting in an estimated $119,794 net annual waste.
In-office dispensing of oral chemotherapy provided significant cost savings to third-party payers compared to mail-order pharmacy dispensing. Continued evaluation may help further justify the importance and value of in-office dispensing.
在许多癌症类型中,口服化疗药物的处方开具越来越频繁。门诊药房配发口服化疗药物已显示出临床益处,同时也给第三方支付方带来了经济利益。先前的一份出版物估计,仅因药品退回库存获得信贷,门诊药房配发每年就能节省超过20万美元的成本。然而,门诊药房的药剂师还会进行许多其他干预措施,这些措施可能会影响财务结果。
评估爱达荷州南部一个为五个门诊癌症中心服务的基于诊所的口服化疗项目在门诊药房配发口服化疗药物的财务影响。结果包括计算口服化疗处方在门诊药房配发和邮购药房的货币浪费和成本避免情况。
对基于诊所的口服化疗项目收到的通过门诊药房配发和邮购药房配药的处方进行监测,以确定2016年12月至2017年5月期间的货币浪费和成本避免情况。收集了退回药品数量、治疗中断和剂量调整等信息。货币结果使用平均批发价格计算。
在为期六个月的评估期间,通过门诊药房配发的处方总成本避免为1,020,193美元(n = 154),总浪费为154,985美元(n = 36),估计每年净成本避免为1,730,416美元。通过邮购配发的处方总成本避免为20,497美元(n = 4),总浪费为80,394美元(n = 15),估计每年净浪费为119,794美元。
与邮购药房配药相比,门诊药房配发口服化疗药物为第三方支付方节省了大量成本。持续评估可能有助于进一步证明门诊药房配发的重要性和价值。