Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Sep 26;20(11):110. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1045-0.
This review aims to discuss the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo coronary stenting with emphasis on the use of double vs triple therapy.
When combined with systemic anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy results in an unacceptable increase in bleeding without any improvement in prevention of thrombotic events. Direct oral anticoagulants combined with single antiplatelet therapy have reduced bleeding compared with warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy. Triple anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants leads to an excess of bleeding and is not superior in preventing thrombotic events. Recent randomized, controlled trials have shown a significant reduction in major bleeding events in patients treated with dual antithrombotic therapy compared with triple therapy without any difference in efficacy. These findings call into question whether triple therapy should remain a part of standard practice.
本篇综述旨在讨论接受冠状动脉支架置入术的房颤患者抗栓治疗的应用,重点讨论双联 vs 三联治疗。
双联抗血小板治疗联合全身抗凝治疗会显著增加出血风险,而对血栓事件的预防并无改善。与华法林联合双联抗血小板治疗相比,直接口服抗凝剂联合单联抗血小板治疗可减少出血。华法林或直接口服抗凝剂三联抗凝治疗会导致出血过多,且在预防血栓事件方面并不优于双联治疗。最近的随机对照试验表明,双联抗栓治疗患者的主要出血事件发生率明显低于三联治疗患者,且疗效无差异。这些发现引发了三联治疗是否应继续作为标准治疗的一部分的质疑。