Miceli Maria, Castelfranchi Cristiano
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Psychol. 2018 Aug 31;14(3):710-733. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1564. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Although most researchers maintain that shame and guilt are distinct emotions, the debate on their differences is still open. We aim to show that some of the current distinctions between shame and guilt need to be redrawn, and their adaptive and social implications need to be revisited. We suggest the following distinguishing criteria: the kind of self-evaluation involved (inadequacy versus harmfulness); one's focus on the perceived discrepancy between actual and ideal self versus one's focus on the perceived responsibility for one's fault; and consequently the different domains of self-esteem involved. Although these criteria have been in part suggested or alluded to in the relevant literature, we use and integrate them with each other in a novel way. This allows to better distinguish between shame and guilt, as well as to account for their possible coexistence or the shift from one emotion to the other.
尽管大多数研究者认为羞耻和内疚是截然不同的情绪,但关于它们差异的争论仍在继续。我们旨在表明,目前羞耻和内疚之间的一些区别需要重新划定,其适应性和社会影响也需要重新审视。我们提出以下区分标准:所涉及的自我评价类型(不足与有害);一个人关注实际自我与理想自我之间的感知差异,还是关注对自己过错的感知责任;以及由此涉及的自尊的不同领域。尽管这些标准在相关文献中已部分被提出或提及,但我们以一种新颖的方式使用并将它们相互整合。这有助于更好地区分羞耻和内疚,并解释它们可能的共存或从一种情绪向另一种情绪的转变。