Department of Veterans Affairs, Population Health Services, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Department of Veterans Affairs, Population Health Services, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
BACKGROUND & AIM: Understanding the real-world effectiveness of all-oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens informs treatment decisions. We evaluated the effectiveness of daclatasvir + sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (DCV + SOF ± RBV) and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VEL/SOF) ± RBV in patients with genotype 2 and genotype 3 infection treated in routine practice.
This observational analysis was carried out in an intent-to-treat cohort of patients with HCV genotype 2 and genotype 3. Sustained virologic response (SVR) analysis was performed in 5,400 patients initiated on DCV + SOF ± RBV or VEL/SOF ± RBV at any Department of Veterans Affairs facility.
For genotype 2, SVR rates did not differ between DCV + SOF (94.5%) and VEL/SOF (94.4%) or between DCV + SOF + RBV (88.1%) and VEL/SOF + RBV (89.5%). For genotype 3, SVR rates did not differ between DCV + SOF (90.8%) and VEL/SOF (92.0%) or between DCV + SOF + RBV (88.1%) and VEL/SOF + RBV (86.4%). In multivariate models of patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection, the treatment regimen was not a significant predictor of the odds of SVR. For genotype 3, significant predictors of reduced odds of SVR were prior HCV treatment-experience (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72; p <0.001), FIB-4 >3.25 (OR 0.60; 95%CI 0.43-0.84; p = 0.002) and a history of decompensated liver disease (OR 0.68; 95%CI 0.47-0.98; p = 0.04). For patients with genotype 2 and 3, treated with VEL/SOF ± RBV, 89% and 85% received 12-weeks of treatment, respectively. For DCV + SOF ± RBV, 56% and 20% of patients with HCV genotype 2 received 12-weeks and 24-weeks of treatment, respectively; while 53% and 23% of patients with HCV genotype 3 received 12-weeks and 24-weeks, with most direct-acting antiviral experienced patients receiving 24-weeks.
In patients infected with HCV genotype 2 and 3, DCV + SOF ± RBV and VEL/SOF ± RBV produced similar SVR rates within each genotype, and the regimen did not have a significant impact on the odds of SVR. For patients with genotype 3, prior treatment-experience and advanced liver disease were significant predictors of reduced odds of SVR regardless of regimen.
In clinical practice, cure rates for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 were 94% and cure rates for HCV genotype 3 were 90%. The chance of achieving cure was the same whether a person received daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir or velpatasvir/sofosbuvir. Ribavirin did not affect cure rates. The chance of a cure was lowest in people who had received HCV medication in the past.
了解所有口服抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)方案的真实疗效可为治疗决策提供信息。我们评估了在常规实践中治疗基因型 2 和 3 感染的患者中使用达卡他韦+索非布韦±利巴韦林(DCV+SOF±RBV)和维帕他韦/索非布韦(VEL/SOF)±RBV 的疗效。
这是一项在意图治疗队列中进行的观察性分析,纳入了在任何退伍军人事务部设施开始接受 DCV+SOF±RBV 或 VEL/SOF±RBV 治疗的 HCV 基因型 2 和 3 患者。在 5400 名接受 DCV+SOF(94.5%)和 VEL/SOF(94.4%)或 DCV+SOF+RBV(88.1%)和 VEL/SOF+RBV(89.5%)治疗的患者中进行了持续病毒学应答(SVR)分析。
对于基因型 2,DCV+SOF(94.5%)和 VEL/SOF(94.4%)之间或 DCV+SOF+RBV(88.1%)和 VEL/SOF+RBV(89.5%)之间的 SVR 率没有差异。对于基因型 3,DCV+SOF(90.8%)和 VEL/SOF(92.0%)之间或 DCV+SOF+RBV(88.1%)和 VEL/SOF+RBV(86.4%)之间的 SVR 率没有差异。在基因型 2 和 3 感染患者的多变量模型中,治疗方案不是 SVR 概率的显著预测因素。对于基因型 3,先前 HCV 治疗经验(比值比[OR]0.51,95%置信区间[CI]0.36-0.72;p<0.001)、FIB-4>3.25(OR 0.60;95%CI 0.43-0.84;p=0.002)和失代偿性肝病病史(OR 0.68;95%CI 0.47-0.98;p=0.04)是 SVR 概率降低的显著预测因素。对于基因型 2 和 3 接受 VEL/SOF±RBV 治疗的患者,分别有 89%和 85%接受了 12 周的治疗。对于 DCV+SOF±RBV,分别有 56%和 20%的基因型 2 患者接受了 12 周和 24 周的治疗,而基因型 3 的患者分别有 53%和 23%接受了 12 周和 24 周的治疗,大多数接受直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的患者接受了 24 周的治疗。
在感染 HCV 基因型 2 和 3 的患者中,DCV+SOF±RBV 和 VEL/SOF±RBV 在每种基因型中产生的 SVR 率相似,并且该方案对 SVR 的概率没有显著影响。对于基因型 3,无论方案如何,先前的治疗经验和晚期肝病都是 SVR 概率降低的显著预测因素。
在临床实践中,丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型 2 的治愈率为 94%,基因型 3 的治愈率为 90%。接受达卡他韦+索非布韦或维帕他韦/索非布韦治疗的患者达到治愈的机会是相同的。利巴韦林不影响治愈率。在过去接受过 HCV 药物治疗的人群中,治愈的机会最低。