Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 1;83:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.059. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
We systematically reviewed the currently available evidence on how the design parameters of surface nanopatterns (e.g. height, diameter, and interspacing) relate to their bactericidal behavior. The systematic search of the literature resulted in 46 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria of examining the bactericidal behavior of nanopatterns with known design parameters in absence of antibacterial agents. Twelve of the included studies also assessed the cytocompatibility of the nanopatterns. Natural and synthetic nanopatterns with a wide range of design parameters were reported in the included studies to exhibit bactericidal behavior. However, most design parameters were in the following ranges: heights of 100-1000 nm, diameters of 10-300 nm, and interspacings of <500 nm. The most commonly used type of nanopatterns were nanopillars, which could kill bacteria in the following range of design parameters: heights of 100-900 nm, diameters of 20-207 nm, and interspacings of 9-380 nm. The vast majority of the cytocompatibility studies (11 out of 12) showed no adverse effects of bactericidal nanopatterns with the only exception being nanopatterns with extremely high aspect ratios. The paper concludes with a discussion on the evidence available in the literature regarding the killing mechanisms of nanopatterns and the effects of other parameters including surface affinity of bacteria, cell size, and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) on the killing efficiency. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The use of nanopatterns to kill bacteria without the need for antibiotics represents a rapidly growing area of research. However, the optimum design parameters to maximize the bactericidal behavior of such physical features need to be fully identified. The present manuscript provides a systematic review of the bactericidal nanopatterned surfaces. Identifying the effective range of dimensions in terms of height, diameter, and interspacings, as well as covering their impact on mammalian cells, has enabled a comprehensive discussion including the bactericidal mechanisms and the factors controlling the bactericidal efficiency. Overall, this review helps the readers have a better understanding of the state-of-the-art in the design of bactericidal nanopatterns, serving as a design guideline and contributing to the design of future experimental studies.
我们系统地回顾了目前关于表面纳米图案(例如高度、直径和间隔)的设计参数与其杀菌行为之间关系的可用证据。对文献的系统搜索导致 46 项研究符合纳入标准,这些研究检查了在没有抗菌剂的情况下具有已知设计参数的纳米图案的杀菌行为。纳入研究中有 12 项还评估了纳米图案的细胞相容性。在纳入的研究中,报道了具有广泛设计参数的天然和合成纳米图案具有杀菌行为。然而,大多数设计参数都在以下范围内:高度为 100-1000nm,直径为 10-300nm,间隔为<500nm。最常用的纳米图案类型是纳米柱,其在以下设计参数范围内可以杀死细菌:高度为 100-900nm,直径为 20-207nm,间隔为 9-380nm。细胞相容性研究的绝大多数(12 项中的 11 项)表明杀菌纳米图案没有不良影响,唯一的例外是具有极高纵横比的纳米图案。本文最后讨论了文献中关于纳米图案杀菌机制以及其他参数(包括细菌表面亲和力、细胞大小和细胞外聚合物物质(EPS))对杀菌效率的影响的证据。意义声明:无需抗生素即可使用纳米图案杀死细菌代表了一个快速发展的研究领域。然而,需要充分确定最大化此类物理特征杀菌行为的最佳设计参数。本手稿提供了对杀菌纳米图案表面的系统综述。确定高度、直径和间隔方面的有效尺寸范围,以及涵盖它们对哺乳动物细胞的影响,使我们能够进行全面讨论,包括杀菌机制和控制杀菌效率的因素。总体而言,本综述有助于读者更好地了解杀菌纳米图案设计的最新技术水平,作为设计指南并为未来的实验研究做出贡献。