Alves Luana S, de Oliveira Renata S, Nora Ângela Dalla, Cuozzo Lemos Luiz Fernando, Rodrigues Jonas A, Zenkner Júlio Eduardo A
Luana S. Alves, DDS, MSc, PhD, is Adjunct Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil; Renata S. de Oliveira, DDS, MSc, PhD, is a clinical practioner; Ângela Dalla Nora, DDS, MSc, is a postgraduate student, Postgraduate Program in Dental Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil; Luiz Fernando Cuozzo Lemos, DDS, MSc, PhD, is Adjunct Professor, Department of Individual Sports, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil; Jonas A. Rodrigues, DDS, MSc, PhD, is Adjunct Professor, Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; and Júlio Eduardo A. Zenkner, DDS, MSc, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
J Dent Educ. 2018 Oct;82(10):1077-1083. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.100.
The aim of this study was to assess the performance of dental students for detecting in vitro occlusal carious lesions using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) with different learning strategies. A convenience sample of all 64 fourth-year dental students at a dental school in Brazil who had no previous experience with ICDAS was selected for the study in 2015. First, students performed the in vitro examination of the occlusal surfaces of 80 teeth according to ICDAS. Two weeks later, students were randomly allocated to three groups: G1 (n=21), ICDAS e-learning; G2 (n=22), ICDAS e-learning + digital learning tool (DLT); G3 (n=21), no training (control group). All students reexamined the 80 teeth according to ICDAS two weeks later. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated according to three thresholds. Of the 64 students, 59 completed all study phases, for a 92.2% participation rate. The intra-group comparison found significantly higher sensitivity and specificity values for G1 and G2 students. G3 students showed an increased sensitivity at the D2 threshold. G2 was the only training strategy that resulted in significant improvement for the AUC. In the comparison of groups at the same threshold, G1 showed higher specificity at D3 threshold (0.78) than G2 (0.72) and G3 (0.73). Regarding sensitivity, G1 showed a lower value at D2 (0.91) threshold than G2 (0.94) and G3 (0.94). In this study, both training strategies (ICDAS e-learning and ICDAS e-learning + DLT) improved the performance of dental students for the in vitro detection of occlusal carious lesions, mainly when the association of methods was used.
本研究的目的是评估牙科学生使用国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)并采用不同学习策略检测体外咬合面龋损的表现。2015年,从巴西一所牙科学院的64名此前没有ICDAS经验的四年级牙科学生中选取了一个便利样本进行研究。首先,学生们根据ICDAS对80颗牙齿的咬合面进行体外检查。两周后,学生们被随机分为三组:G1组(n = 21),ICDAS电子学习组;G2组(n = 22),ICDAS电子学习 + 数字学习工具(DLT)组;G3组(n = 21),无培训组(对照组)。两周后,所有学生再次根据ICDAS对80颗牙齿进行检查。根据三个阈值计算敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。64名学生中,59名完成了所有研究阶段,参与率为92.2%。组内比较发现,G1组和G2组学生的敏感性和特异性值显著更高。G3组学生在D2阈值时敏感性有所提高。G2是唯一一种导致AUC有显著改善的培训策略。在相同阈值下的组间比较中,G1组在D3阈值(0.78)时的特异性高于G2组(0.72)和G3组(0.73)。在敏感性方面,G1组在D2阈值(0.91)时的值低于G2组(0.94)和G3组(0.94)。在本研究中,两种培训策略(ICDAS电子学习和ICDAS电子学习 + DLT)都提高了牙科学生体外检测咬合面龋损的表现,主要是在采用方法组合时。