London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
University of Liverpool.
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):472-498. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12339.
Policy Points: Worldwide, more than 70% of all deaths are attributable to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), nearly half of which are premature and apply to individuals of working age. Although such deaths are largely preventable, effective solutions continue to elude the public health community. One reason is the considerable influence of the "commercial determinants of health": NCDs are the product of a system that includes powerful corporate actors, who are often involved in public health policymaking. This article shows how a complex systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs, and it explains how this can help with (1) conceptualizing the problem of NCDs and (2) developing effective policy interventions.
The high burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) is politically salient and eminently preventable. However, effective solutions largely continue to elude the public health community. Two pressing issues heighten this challenge: the first is the public health community's narrow approach to addressing NCDs, and the second is the involvement of corporate actors in policymaking. While NCDs are often conceptualized in terms of individual-level risk factors, we argue that they should be reframed as products of a complex system. This article explores the value of a systems approach to understanding NCDs as an emergent property of a complex system, with a focus on commercial actors.
Drawing on Donella Meadows's systems thinking framework, this article examines how a systems perspective may be used to analyze the commercial determinants of NCDs and, specifically, how unhealthy commodity industries influence public health policy.
Unhealthy commodity industries actively design and shape the NCD policy system, intervene at different levels of the system to gain agency over policy and politics, and legitimize their presence in public health policy decisions.
It should be possible to apply the principles of systems thinking to other complex public health issues, not just NCDs. Such an approach should be tested and refined for other complex public health challenges.
政策要点:在全球范围内,超过 70%的死亡归因于非传染性疾病(NCD),其中近一半是过早死亡,发生在工作年龄的个体身上。尽管这些死亡在很大程度上是可以预防的,但有效的解决方案继续让公共卫生界感到困惑。其中一个原因是“健康的商业决定因素”的巨大影响:NCD 是一个系统的产物,其中包括强大的企业行为者,他们经常参与公共卫生政策制定。本文展示了如何使用复杂系统的观点来分析 NCD 的商业决定因素,并解释了如何这有助于(1)概念化 NCD 问题,(2)制定有效的政策干预措施。
非传染性疾病(NCD)的负担沉重,具有明显的政治意义,而且完全可以预防。然而,有效的解决方案在很大程度上仍然让公共卫生界感到困惑。两个紧迫的问题加剧了这一挑战:第一个是公共卫生界解决 NCD 问题的狭隘方法,第二个是企业行为者参与决策制定。虽然 NCD 通常被概念化为个体层面的风险因素,但我们认为,它们应该被重新定义为一个复杂系统的产物。本文探讨了系统方法对于理解 NCD 作为一个复杂系统的涌现属性的价值,重点是商业行为者。
本文借鉴了唐娜·梅多斯的系统思维框架,考察了如何使用系统视角分析 NCD 的商业决定因素,特别是不健康商品行业如何影响公共卫生政策。
不健康的商品行业积极设计和塑造 NCD 政策系统,在系统的不同层次上进行干预,以获得对政策和政治的影响力,并使他们在公共卫生政策决策中的存在合法化。
应该有可能将系统思维的原则应用于其他复杂的公共卫生问题,而不仅仅是 NCD。应该对这种方法进行测试和改进,以应对其他复杂的公共卫生挑战。