Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via G.B. Vico, 46, Varese 21100, Italy.
Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via G.B. Vico, 46, Varese 21100, Italy; Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, 38123, Trento, Italy; Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 15;230:366-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.095. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
The introduction of effective solid waste management strategies in developing countries should be considered for improving sustainability at global level. Many barriers should be overcome, concerning the introduction of environmental policies, effective investments, social inclusion and public awareness, which are significant issues in low-middle income countries. The Circular Economy could represent the answer for improving current solid waste management activities worldwide, since denote the principle of waste valorization and recycling for boosting developing economies. This paper is focused on this theme, analyzing main opportunities for improving the current state of solid waste management in developing big cities. The solid waste management of two countries are reviewed: Romania is the emerging country where Circular Economy is becoming a future objective due to economic aids and strength regulations which the European Union (EU) established for the nations forming parts the alliance; as a comparison, Bolivia is reported for evaluating main differences founded for developing recycling systems in a no-EU country. These two case studies could be of interest for highlighting main pros and cons of the participation into a wide organization like the EU for introducing in short terms Circular Economy principles. Moreover, a theoretical Circular Economy model for developing big cities in low-middle income countries is described within the study for effectively comparing which chances can spread for these countries as regard municipal solid waste exploitation. Despite the economic level, Romania and Bolivia are both facing with many solid waste management issues although in different magnitude. For the Romanian case study, it is visible how it cannot achieve the European goals for 2020 due the need of change in public recycling behavior. Bolivia, instead, represents the case where international aids and new investments are required, considering the informal sector into the formal management system as a real opportunity for improving local recycling rate. In conclusion, the comparison suggests how external supports led to implement the principles of the Circular Economy within a developing region. The model of Circular Economy proposed is recommended for developing big cities in order to advance a new form of safe employment, encouraging the activities that are still in action (i.e. informal sector) and boosting the principles of sustainable development.
发展中国家应考虑引入有效的固体废物管理策略,以提高全球可持续性。在中低收入国家,引入环境政策、有效投资、社会包容和公众意识方面存在诸多障碍,这些都是重大问题。循环经济可以代表改善全球当前固体废物管理活动的答案,因为它体现了废物增值和回收利用的原则,以促进发展中经济体。本文聚焦于这一主题,分析了改善发展中大城市当前固体废物管理状况的主要机遇。本文回顾了两个国家的固体废物管理情况:罗马尼亚是一个新兴国家,由于欧盟为其成员国制定的经济援助和严格法规,循环经济正成为未来的目标;作为比较,玻利维亚被报道是为了评估在非欧盟国家发展回收系统时发现的主要差异。这两个案例研究可以说明加入像欧盟这样的广泛组织的主要利弊,以在短期内引入循环经济原则。此外,本研究还描述了一个发展中低收入国家大城市的理论循环经济模型,以便有效地比较这些国家在城市固体废物开发方面可能获得的机会。尽管经济水平不同,但罗马尼亚和玻利维亚都面临着许多固体废物管理问题。就罗马尼亚的案例研究而言,由于需要改变公众的回收行为,该国无法实现 2020 年的欧洲目标。玻利维亚则代表了需要国际援助和新投资的情况,将非正规部门纳入正规管理系统是提高当地回收利用率的一个真正机会。总之,比较表明外部支持如何导致在发展中地区实施循环经济原则。建议采用所提出的循环经济模型来发展大城市,以推进一种新的安全就业形式,鼓励仍在运作的活动(即非正规部门),并促进可持续发展原则。