Suppr超能文献

PARP 抑制剂在卵巢癌中的时代:“集体诉讼”还是没有?系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Era of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: "Class Action" or not? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Medical Oncology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Græcia University and Cancer Center, Campus Salvatore Venuta, Catanzaro, Italy.

Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Nov;131:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carboplatin is the milestone of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treatment, thus response to platinum is the major prognostic factor. Among platinum-sensitive patients, 40% carry a germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. In this scenario a new class of drugs, the PARP inhibitors (PARPis), produced a significant improvement in long-term disease control. In order to make an aggregate evaluation of the impact of these agents, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical trials were selected by searching "Pubmed" database and abstracts from major cancer meetings. We considered the January 2008 - April 2018 time frame. Progression free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point, toxicities were secondary end-points. Hazard ratios (HRs) of PFS, with confidence intervals, and risk ratios of grade 3-4 toxicity rates, were extracted from retrieved studies and included in the current analysis. Meta-analysis was carried out by the fixed and random effect models. We conducted this meta-analysis to also compare indirectly the efficacy of different PARPis in EOC patients.

RESULTS

Five randomized trials for a total of 1839 patients were selected and included in the final analysis. In particular, we evaluated a BRCA-mutant cohort (871 patients) with a pooled HR 0.25 (95%CI 0.21-0.31) and the BRCA-wild type cohort (836 patients) with a pooled HR 0.41 (95%CI 0.31-0.55), respectively. Regarding safety profile, no significant differences were detected in all grade toxicities, however, taking into account 3-4 grade toxicities and SAEs (severe adverse events), we show that rucaparib-treated patients reported major abdominal pain events, while niraparib-treated patients were associated with the highest percentage of haematological toxicities, hypothesizing a drug effect for the safety analysis. In the indirect comparisons, significant differences were not detected on PFS for the different agents.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm a significant benefit in survival outcome of PARPis for EOC patients with a "class effect" on the bases of narrow CI and indirect comparisons in the different groups. Therefore, we underline that this strategy is of special value in BRCA-mutated patients because genetic testing allows best patient selection for all PARPis with the added value of individualized prevention in familiars.

摘要

简介

卡铂是上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)治疗的里程碑,因此对铂类的反应是主要的预后因素。在铂类敏感的患者中,40%携带种系或体细胞 BRCA1/2 突变。在这种情况下,一类新的药物,聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi),在长期疾病控制方面取得了显著改善。为了对这些药物的影响进行综合评估,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。

患者和方法

通过搜索“Pubmed”数据库和主要癌症会议的摘要,选择临床试验。我们考虑了 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月的时间范围。无进展生存期(PFS)是主要终点,毒性是次要终点。从检索到的研究中提取 PFS 的风险比(HR)、置信区间和 3-4 级毒性发生率的风险比,并纳入当前分析。荟萃分析采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,还比较了不同 PARPi 在 EOC 患者中的疗效。

结果

选择了五项随机试验,共 1839 例患者纳入最终分析。特别是,我们评估了 BRCA 突变亚组(871 例患者)的疗效,汇总 HR 为 0.25(95%CI 0.21-0.31),BRCA 野生型亚组(836 例患者)的汇总 HR 为 0.41(95%CI 0.31-0.55)。关于安全性,所有级别毒性均无显著差异,但考虑到 3-4 级毒性和严重不良事件(SAEs),我们发现鲁卡帕利治疗的患者报告了严重的腹痛事件,而尼拉帕利治疗的患者与最高比例的血液学毒性相关,这提示药物对安全性分析有影响。在间接比较中,不同药物在 PFS 上未检测到显著差异。

结论

我们证实了 PARPi 对 EOC 患者的生存结果有显著获益,这是基于狭窄的 CI 和不同组别的间接比较得出的“类效应”。因此,我们强调,这种策略在 BRCA 突变患者中特别有价值,因为基因检测允许对所有 PARPi 进行最佳的患者选择,同时为家族成员提供个体化预防,增加了附加值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验