Smith Shelby R, Patel Nirav K, White Alex E, Hadley Christopher J, Dodson Christopher C
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 8;6(10):2325967118799262. doi: 10.1177/2325967118799262. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Stress fractures of the elbow are rare in throwing athletes and present a challenge from both a management and rehabilitation perspective. Although the incidence of stress fractures of the elbow is increasing, there is a lack of data in the literature focused on throwers.
To evaluate studies regarding the management and outcomes of stress fractures of the elbow in throwing athletes.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
A systematic review was conducted by searching the Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to identify studies reporting on the management and outcomes of stress fractures in overhead-throwing athletes. Management data included nonoperative and operative modalities, and outcome data included return to play, encompassing the timing and level of activity. Studies were excluded if the stress fracture of the elbow was not a result of a sport injury attributed to throwing or if the study failed to report whether an athlete returned to play.
Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. There were 52 patients in total (50 male, 2 female) with a mean age of 19.7 years (range, 13-29.1 years). The olecranon was the most common location of the stress fracture (51 patients; 98.1%), followed by the distal humerus (1 patient; 1.9%). The majority of patients (n = 40; 76.9%) were treated operatively. Of the 40 patients who were treated surgically, 14 (35.0%) underwent a period of conservative treatment preoperatively that ultimately failed because of persistent nonunion or continued elbow pain. A total of 50 patients (96.2%) returned to sport either at or above their preinjury level. Of the 2 patients (3.8%) who did not return to sport, 1 did not return because of continued elbow pain postoperatively, and the other was lost to follow-up. Complications occurred in 9 patients (17.3%), all of whom were treated surgically.
On the basis of this systematic review, the majority of elbow stress fractures were treated operatively and approximately one-third after a period of failed nonoperative management. The return-to-sport rate was high. Further, higher level studies are needed to optimize management and return-to-sport rates in this population.
肘部应力性骨折在投掷运动员中较为罕见,从管理和康复角度来看都具有挑战性。尽管肘部应力性骨折的发生率在上升,但文献中缺乏针对投掷运动员的相关数据。
评估关于投掷运动员肘部应力性骨折的管理及结果的研究。
系统评价;证据等级,4级。
通过检索Scopus、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库进行系统评价,以识别报告过头投掷运动员应力性骨折管理及结果的研究。管理数据包括非手术和手术方式,结果数据包括恢复运动情况,涵盖恢复时间和活动水平。如果肘部应力性骨折不是由投掷运动损伤导致,或者研究未报告运动员是否恢复运动,则排除该研究。
14项研究符合纳入标准并纳入本分析。共有52例患者(50例男性,2例女性),平均年龄19.7岁(范围13 - 29.1岁)。鹰嘴是应力性骨折最常见的部位(51例患者;98.1%),其次是肱骨远端(1例患者;1.9%)。大多数患者(n = 40;76.9%)接受了手术治疗。在40例接受手术治疗的患者中,14例(35.0%)术前经历了一段时间的保守治疗,但最终因持续不愈合或肘部持续疼痛而失败。共有50例患者(96.2%)恢复到受伤前或更高水平的运动。在2例未恢复运动的患者(3.8%)中,1例因术后肘部持续疼痛未恢复,另1例失访。9例患者(17.3%)出现并发症,均接受了手术治疗。
基于本系统评价,大多数肘部应力性骨折接受了手术治疗,约三分之一在非手术治疗失败后进行手术。恢复运动率较高。此外,需要更高水平的研究来优化该人群的管理和恢复运动率。