Suppr超能文献

数字健康中的性别动态:克服盲点和偏见,抓住变革性卫生系统的机遇和责任。

Gender dynamics in digital health: overcoming blind spots and biases to seize opportunities and responsibilities for transformative health systems.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(suppl_2):ii6-ii11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy180.

Abstract

Much remains to ensure that digital health affirms rather than retrenches inequality, including for gender. Drawing from literature and from the SEARCH projects in this supplement, this commentary highlights key gender dynamics in digital health, including blind spots and biases, as well as transformative opportunities and responsibilities. Women face structural and social barriers that inhibit their participation in digital health, but are also frequently positioned as beneficiaries without opportunities to shape such projects to better fit their needs. Furthermore, overlooking gender relations and focussing on women in isolation can reinforce, rather than address, women's exclusions in digital health, and worsen negative unanticipated consequences. While digital health provides opportunities to transform gender relations, gender is an intimate and deeply structural form of social inequality that rarely changes due to a single initiative or short-term project. Sustained support over time, across health system stakeholders and levels is required to ensure that transformative change with one set of actors is replicated and reinforced elsewhere in the health system. There is no one size prescriptive formula or checklist. Incremental learning and reflection is required to nurture ownership and respond to unanticipated reactions over time when transforming gender and its multiple intersections with inequality.

摘要

为了确保数字健康能够肯定而不是加剧不平等,包括性别不平等,还有许多工作要做。本评论从文献和本增刊中的 SEARCH 项目中提取,重点介绍了数字健康中的关键性别动态,包括盲点和偏见,以及变革性的机会和责任。女性面临着结构性和社会性的障碍,限制了她们参与数字健康,但她们也经常被定位为受益者,而没有机会塑造这些项目,以更好地满足她们的需求。此外,忽视性别关系,孤立地关注女性,可能会强化而不是解决女性在数字健康中的排斥问题,并加剧意想不到的负面后果。虽然数字健康为改变性别关系提供了机会,但性别是一种亲密而深刻的结构性社会不平等形式,很少因单一举措或短期项目而改变。需要在时间上、在卫生系统利益攸关方和各级之间提供持续支持,以确保在一个行为体层面进行变革性改变,并在卫生系统的其他地方得到复制和加强。没有一种一刀切的规范性公式或清单。在变革性别及其与不平等的多种交叉点时,需要不断学习和反思,以培养所有权,并对意想不到的反应做出回应。

相似文献

2
Digital health, gender and health equity: invisible imperatives.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(suppl_2):ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy171.
3
Analyzing gender inequality through large-scale Facebook advertising data.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):6958-6963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717781115. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys.
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jun;3(6):e332-40. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3.
6
Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health.
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2440-2454. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Gender dynamics affecting maternal health and health care access and use in Uganda.
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Dec 1;32(suppl_5):v13-v21. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx011.
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

3
Towards women's digital health equity: A qualitative inquiry into attitude and adoption of reproductive mHealth services in Bangladesh.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):e0000637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000637. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
A multidimensional gender analysis of health technology self-efficacy among people with Parkinson's disease.
J Neurol. 2024 Oct;271(10):6750-6760. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12635-3. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
6
An introduction to digital determinants of health.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jan 4;3(1):e0000346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000346. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Gender transformative approaches in mHealth for maternal healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 7;5:1263488. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1263488. eCollection 2023.
9
African governments must build on covid-19 responses to advance gender equality.
BMJ. 2023 Jun 7;381:e072239. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072239.

本文引用的文献

1
Networking in eHealth research: results of the IDRC SEARCH program evaluation.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(suppl_2):ii12-ii15. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy193.
4
mHealth use for non-communicable diseases care in primary health: patients' perspective from rural settings and refugee camps.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(suppl_2):ii52-ii63. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy172.
7
Materno-infantilism, feminism and maternal health policy in Brazil.
Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Jun;20(39):125-32. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39616-X.
8
Registration and monitoring of pregnant women in Tamil Nadu, India: a critique.
Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Jun;20(39):118-24. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39619-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验