Departments of Biological Engineering, Chemistry and The Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
DNA Repair (Amst). 2018 Nov;71:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
In a multicellular organism, somatic mutations represent a permanent record of the past chemical and biochemical perturbations experienced by a cell in its local microenvironment. Akin to a perpetual recording device, with every replication, genomic DNA accumulates mutations in patterns that reflect: i) the sequence context-dependent formation of DNA damage, due to environmental or endogenous reactive species, including spontaneous processes; ii) the activity of DNA repair pathways, which, depending on the type of lesion, can erase, ignore or exacerbate the mutagenic consequences of that DNA damage; and iii) the choice of replication machinery that synthesizes the nascent genomic copy. These three factors result in a richly contoured sequence context-dependent mutational spectrum that, from appearances, is distinct for most individual forms of DNA damage. Such a mutagenic legacy, if appropriately decoded, can reveal the local history of genome-altering events such as chemical or pathogen exposures, metabolic stress, and inflammation, which in turn can provide an indication of the underlying causes and mechanisms of genetic disease. Modern tools have positioned us to develop a deep mechanistic understanding of the cellular factors and pathways that modulate a mutational process and, in turn, provide opportunities for better diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, better exposure risk assessment and even actionable therapeutic targets. The goal of this Perspective is to present a bottom-up, lesion-centric framework of mutagenesis that integrates the contributions of lesion replication, lesion repair and lesion formation to explain the complex mutational spectra that emerge in the genome following exposure to mutagens. The mutational spectra of the well-studied hepatocarcinogen aflatoxin B are showcased here as specific examples, but the implications are meant to be generalizable.
在多细胞生物中,体细胞突变代表了细胞在其局部微环境中经历的过去化学和生化扰动的永久记录。类似于一个永久记录设备,每次复制时,基因组 DNA 都会以反映以下模式积累突变:i)由于环境或内源性反应性物质(包括自发过程),DNA 损伤的序列上下文依赖性形成;ii)DNA 修复途径的活性,根据病变的类型,这些途径可以擦除、忽略或加剧该 DNA 损伤的诱变后果;iii)合成新生基因组副本的复制机制的选择。这三个因素导致了丰富的、轮廓分明的序列上下文依赖性突变谱,从外观上看,大多数个体形式的 DNA 损伤都有明显的区别。如果适当解码,这种诱变遗传可以揭示改变基因组的事件的局部历史,例如化学或病原体暴露、代谢应激和炎症,这反过来又可以提供遗传疾病的潜在原因和机制的指示。现代工具使我们能够深入了解调节突变过程的细胞因素和途径,并为更好的诊断和预后生物标志物、更好的暴露风险评估甚至可行的治疗靶点提供机会。本观点的目的是提出一个自下而上的、以损伤为中心的诱变框架,该框架整合了损伤复制、损伤修复和损伤形成的贡献,以解释在暴露于诱变剂后基因组中出现的复杂突变谱。这里展示了研究充分的肝癌物黄曲霉毒素 B 的突变谱作为具体示例,但含义应该是普遍适用的。