Kadeer Xiermaimaiti, Wang Long, Zhang Lei, Shi Weirong, Chen Chang
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Branch Affiliated to Tongji University, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1188-1193. doi: 10.1002/jso.25261. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
The localization of multiple pulmonary nodules is challenging due to a high incidence of pneumothorax after each needle insertion into lung parenchyma. The aim of the current study is to verify the safety and effectiveness of a modified technique utilizing simultaneous Hookwire placement to localize multiple lesions.
The proposed method comprises a row of metal wires, perpendicular insertion, simultaneous release of Hookwire, and a lateral position to modify a conventional localizing technique. From January 2015 to August 2016, 23 patients were subjected to the modified technique group (Group A), while 53 patients in the conventional group (Group B). Success rates, procedural parameters, and complications were recorded and analyzed.
Compared with Group B, Group A had higher success rate of lesion (96.7% vs 83.5%, P = 0.009), lower numbers of CT scans (2.91 vs 5.59, P < 0.001), shorter procedure duration (13.83 minutes vs 22.68 minutes, P < 0.001), and shorter distance between localizers and lesions (4.88 vs 6.29, P = 0.006). The incidence of pneumothorax in Group A was lower (21.8% vs 54.7%, P = 0.008), while lung hemorrhage was not significantly different ( P = 0.735). Lesion number and pneumothorax were risk factors for failure in multiple localizations.
The modified Hookwire placement technique was feasible and successful, which was associated with fewer computed tomography scans, shorter procedure duration, and a lower incidence of pneumothorax.
由于每次将针插入肺实质后气胸发生率较高,多个肺结节的定位具有挑战性。本研究的目的是验证一种利用同步放置定位导丝来定位多个病变的改良技术的安全性和有效性。
所提出的方法包括一排金属丝、垂直插入、同步释放定位导丝以及采用外侧位置来改良传统定位技术。2015年1月至2016年8月,23例患者接受改良技术组(A组),而53例患者在传统组(B组)。记录并分析成功率、操作参数和并发症。
与B组相比,A组病变成功率更高(96.7%对83.5%,P = 0.009),CT扫描次数更少(2.91对5.59,P < 0.001),操作持续时间更短(13.83分钟对22.68分钟,P < 0.001),定位器与病变之间的距离更短(4.88对6.29,P = 0.006)。A组气胸发生率更低(21.8%对54.7%,P = 0.008),而肺出血无显著差异(P = 0.735)。病变数量和气胸是多次定位失败的危险因素。
改良的定位导丝放置技术可行且成功,与更少的计算机断层扫描、更短的操作持续时间和气胸发生率降低相关。