Zhang Tong, Liu Lixu, Xie Rong, Peng Ying, Wang Huifang, Chen Zhuoming, Wu Shizheng, Ni Chaomin, Zheng Jiejiao, Li Xueping, Liu Heyu, Xu Guangxu, Fan Jianzhong, Zhu Yuhong, Zhang Fang, Du Yanhui, Wang Xin, Wang Yulong, Xiao Weimin, Liu Ming, Mou Xiang, Zhao Jun, Song Luping, Li Bingjie
China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing Boai Hospital, Integrative Department, Capital Medical University Rehabilitation Academy.
Department of Rehabilitation, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12802. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012802.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in stroke rehabilitation assessment in China and to identify correlations between the ICF and several commonly used clinical assessment instruments for stroke.In total, 52 hospitals and 5 premier rehabilitation and neurology research centers participated in this cross-sectional multicenter clinical study. A total of 2822 stroke patients admitted to a neurology or rehabilitation department of a participating medical center between July 2012 and June 2014 were included. The ICF checklist contains 4 parts with 128 two-level items: body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors. We analyzed the results of ICF assessments and determined whether correlations existed between the various items of the ICF and several commonly used clinical assessment instruments.In all but 3 instances, the scores for the ICF-b-body function, ICF-s-body structure-degree of impairment, ICF-s-body structure-impairment location, ICF-d-activity performance, ICF-d-ability performance, ICF-e-facilitator, and ICF-e-barrier correlated significantly (P < .05) with the scores for the commonly used clinical assessment instruments.The ICF checklist is a new rehabilitation assessment instrument that is compatible with commonly used clinical assessment scales for stroke and can be used in combination with these scales.
本研究旨在评估国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)在中国脑卒中康复评估中的有效性,并确定ICF与几种常用的脑卒中临床评估工具之间的相关性。共有52家医院和5家顶级康复与神经学研究中心参与了这项横断面多中心临床研究。纳入了2012年7月至2014年6月期间在参与研究的医疗中心的神经内科或康复科住院的2822例脑卒中患者。ICF清单包含4个部分,共128个二级条目:身体功能、身体结构、活动与参与以及环境因素。我们分析了ICF评估结果,并确定ICF的各个条目与几种常用临床评估工具之间是否存在相关性。除3例情况外,ICF-b-身体功能、ICF-s-身体结构-损伤程度、ICF-s-身体结构-损伤部位、ICF-d-活动表现、ICF-d-能力表现、ICF-e-促进因素和ICF-e-障碍的得分与常用临床评估工具的得分均显著相关(P<0.05)。ICF清单是一种新的康复评估工具,与常用的脑卒中临床评估量表兼容,可与这些量表联合使用。