Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
These authors contributed equally.
Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 13;52(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01444-2018. Print 2018 Dec.
Previous publications have highlighted the disparity between research trial populations and those in clinical practice, but it has not been established how this relates to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of phenotype-targeted biological therapies in severe asthma.Detailed characterisation data for 342 severe asthma patients within the Wessex Severe Asthma Cohort (WSAC) was compared against comprehensive trial eligibility criteria for published phase IIB and phase III RCTs evaluating biological therapies in severe asthma since 2000.37 RCTs evaluating 20 biological therapies were identified. Only a median of 9.8% (range 3.5-17.5%) of severe asthma patients were found to be eligible for enrolment in the phase III trials. Stipulations for airflow obstruction, bronchodilator reversibility and smoking history excluded significant numbers of patients. A median of 78.9% (range 73.2-86.6%) of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma would have been excluded from participation in the phase III licensing trials of interleukin (IL)-5/IL-5R targeted therapies.Despite including only well characterised and optimally treated severe asthmatics under specialist care within the WSAC study, the vast majority were excluded from trial participation by criteria designed to re-confirm diagnostic labels rather than by biomarker criteria that predict the characteristic addressed by the treatment.
先前的出版物强调了研究试验人群与临床实践人群之间的差异,但尚未确定这与针对严重哮喘的表型靶向生物疗法的随机对照试验(RCT)有何关系。
将 342 名严重哮喘患者在 Wessex 严重哮喘队列(WSAC)中的详细特征数据与自 2000 年以来发表的评估严重哮喘生物疗法的 IIB 期和 III 期 RCT 的综合试验纳入标准进行了比较。
确定了 37 项评估 20 种生物疗法的 RCT。在 III 期试验中,仅有中位数 9.8%(范围 3.5-17.5%)的严重哮喘患者被认为有资格入组。气流阻塞、支气管扩张剂可逆性和吸烟史的规定排除了大量患者。在严重嗜酸粒细胞性哮喘患者中,中位数 78.9%(范围 73.2-86.6%)的患者将被排除在 IL-5/IL-5R 靶向治疗的 III 期许可试验之外。
尽管在 WSAC 研究中仅纳入了特征良好且接受最佳治疗的严重哮喘患者,但绝大多数患者因旨在重新确认诊断标签而不是预测治疗所针对特征的生物标志物标准而被排除在试验之外。