Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):11754-11759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811455115. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
This work proposes a method to compute the income gradient in period life expectancy that accounts for income mobility. Using income and mortality records of the Danish population over the period 1980-2013, we validate the method and provide estimates of the income gradient. The period life expectancy of individuals at a certain age, and belonging to a certain income class, is normally computed by using the mortality of older cohorts in the same income class. This approach does not take into account that a substantial fraction of the population moves away from their original income class, which leads to an upward bias in the estimation of the income gradient in life expectancy. For 40-y-olds in the bottom 5% of the income distribution, the risk of dying before age 60 is overestimated by 25%. For the top 5% income class, the risk of dying is underestimated by 20%. By incorporating a classic approach from the social mobility literature, we provide a method that predicts income mobility and future mortality simultaneously. With this method, the association between income and life expectancy is lower throughout the income distribution. Without accounting for income mobility, the estimated difference in life expectancy between persons in percentiles 20 and 80 in the income distribution is 4.6 y for males and 4.1 y for females, while it is only half as big when accounting for mobility. The estimated rise in life-expectancy inequality over time is also halved when accounting for income mobility.
这项工作提出了一种方法,用于计算考虑收入流动性的时期预期寿命的收入梯度。使用丹麦人口在 1980-2013 年期间的收入和死亡率记录,我们验证了该方法并提供了收入梯度的估计值。特定年龄和特定收入阶层的个体的时期预期寿命通常是通过使用同一收入阶层中较年长队列的死亡率来计算的。这种方法没有考虑到很大一部分人口会离开他们原来的收入阶层,这导致了预期寿命中收入梯度的估计值向上偏倚。对于收入分配底层 5%的 40 岁人群,60 岁前死亡的风险高估了 25%。对于收入最高的 5%阶层,死亡风险低估了 20%。通过纳入社会流动文献中的经典方法,我们提供了一种同时预测收入流动和未来死亡率的方法。使用这种方法,收入与预期寿命之间的相关性在整个收入分布中较低。如果不考虑收入流动性,那么在收入分布中处于 20%和 80%百分位数的人之间的预期寿命差异估计值为男性 4.6 岁,女性 4.1 岁,而考虑到流动性时,这一差异只有一半大。考虑到收入流动性时,预期寿命不平等随时间的上升幅度也减半。