Ismail Siti Nadirah, Awad Elmutaz Atta, Zulkifli Idrus, Goh Yong Meng, Sazili Awis Qurni
Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 Jun;32(6):865-873. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0354. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
The study was designed to investigate the effects of restraint method, restraint duration, and body weight on stress-linked hormones (corticosterone, adrenaline, and noradrenaline), blood biochemical (namely glucose and lactate), and the meat quality in broiler chickens.
A total of 120 male broiler chickens (Cobb 500) were assigned to a 2×3×2 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design using two restraint methods (shackle and cone), three durations of restraint (10, 30, and 60 s), and two categories of live body weight (1.8±0.1 kg as lightweight and 2.8±0.1 kg as heavyweight).
Irrespective of the duration of restraint and body weight, the coned chickens were found to have lower plasma corticosterone (p<0.01), lactate (p<0.001), lower meat drip loss (p<0.01), cooking loss (p<0.05), and higher blood loss (p<0.05) compared with their shackled counterparts. The duration of restraint had significant effects on the meat initial pH (p<0.05), ultimate pH (p<0.05), and yellowness (p<0.01). The lightweight broilers exhibited higher (p< 0.001) blood loss and lower (p<0.05) cooking loss compared to the heavyweight broilers, regardless of the restraint method used and the duration of restraint. However, the interaction between the restraint method, duration of restraint, and body weight contributed to differences in pre-slaughter stress and meat quality. Therefore, the interaction between the restraint method and the duration of restraint affected the meat shear force, lightness (L*) and redness (a*).
The duration of restraint and body weight undoubtedly affect stress responses and meat quality of broiler chickens. Regardless of the duration of restraint and body weight, the cone restraint resulted in notably lower stress, lower meat water loss, and higher blood loss compared to shackling. Overall, the findings of this study showed that restraint method, duration of restraint, and body weight may affect the stress response and meat quality parameters in broilers and should be considered independently or interactively in future studies.
本研究旨在探讨束缚方法、束缚持续时间和体重对肉鸡应激相关激素(皮质酮、肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素)、血液生化指标(即葡萄糖和乳酸)以及肉质的影响。
总共120只雄性肉鸡(科宝500)采用完全随机设计,按2×3×2析因安排,使用两种束缚方法(脚环和锥形)、三种束缚持续时间(10、30和60秒)以及两类活体体重(1.8±0.1千克为轻体重,2.8±0.1千克为重体重)。
无论束缚持续时间和体重如何,发现与戴脚环的肉鸡相比,使用锥形束缚的肉鸡血浆皮质酮水平较低(p<0.01)、乳酸水平较低(p<0.001)、肉滴水损失较低(p<0.01)、蒸煮损失较低(p<0.05)且失血较多(p<0.05)。束缚持续时间对肉的初始pH值(p<0.05)、最终pH值(p<0.05)和黄度(p<0.01)有显著影响。无论使用何种束缚方法和束缚持续时间,轻体重肉鸡的失血量均高于重体重肉鸡(p<0.001),蒸煮损失低于重体重肉鸡(p<0.05)。然而,束缚方法、束缚持续时间和体重之间的相互作用导致宰前应激和肉质存在差异。因此,束缚方法和束缚持续时间之间的相互作用影响了肉的剪切力、亮度(L*)和红度(a*)。
束缚持续时间和体重无疑会影响肉鸡的应激反应和肉质。无论束缚持续时间和体重如何,与脚环束缚相比,锥形束缚导致的应激明显较低、肉水分损失较低且失血较多。总体而言,本研究结果表明,束缚方法、束缚持续时间和体重可能会影响肉鸡的应激反应和肉质参数,在未来研究中应单独或交互考虑。