Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 1;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0876-z.
Despite the growing number of people with migrant background in Germany, a systematic review about their utilization of health care and differences to the non-migrant population is lacking. By covering various sectors of health care and migrant populations, the review aimed at giving a general overview and identifying special areas of potential intervention.
A systematic review was conducted in PubMed database including records that were published until 1st of June 2017. Further criteria for eligibility were a publication in a peer-reviewed journal written in English or German language. The studies have to report quantitative and original data of a population residing in Germany. The appropriateness of the studies was judged by both authors. Studies were excluded if native controls were not originated from the same sample. Moreover, indicators of health care utilization have to assess individual behaviour like consultation or participation rates. 63 studies met the inclusion criteria for a qualitative synthesis of the findings.
The overall findings indicate a lower utilization among migrants, although the results vary in terms of health care sector, indicator of health care utilization and migrant population. For specialist care, medication use, therapist consultations and counselling, rehabilitation as well as disease prevention (early cancer detection, prevention programs for children and oral health check-ups) a lower utilization among people with migrant background was found. The lower usage was particularly shown for migrants of the 1st generation, people with two-sided migrant background, children/adolescents and women. Due to the methodological heterogeneity a meta-analysis was not feasible. As most of the studies were cross-sectional, no causal interpretations could be drawn.
The inequalities in utilization could not substantially be explained by differences in the socioeconomic status. Other reasons of lower utilization could be due to differences in need, preferences, information, language and formal access barriers (e.g. charges, waiting times, travel distances or lost wages). Different migrant-specific and migrant-sensitive strategies are relevant to address the problem for certain health care sectors and migrant populations.
The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42014015162 ).
尽管德国有越来越多的移民背景的人,但缺乏对他们的医疗保健利用情况和与非移民人口差异的系统综述。通过涵盖医疗保健的各个领域和移民群体,本综述旨在提供一个总体概述,并确定潜在干预的特殊领域。
在 PubMed 数据库中进行了系统综述,包括截至 2017 年 6 月 1 日发表的记录。进一步的入选标准是发表在同行评议的英文或德文期刊上的研究。研究必须报告居住在德国的人群的定量和原始数据。两位作者共同判断研究的适宜性。如果原始对照并非来自同一样本,则将研究排除在外。此外,医疗保健利用的指标必须评估咨询或参与率等个人行为。有 63 项研究符合纳入标准,可对研究结果进行定性综合分析。
总体研究结果表明,移民的利用率较低,尽管在医疗保健领域、医疗保健利用指标和移民群体方面的结果存在差异。在专科医疗、药物使用、治疗师咨询和咨询、康复以及疾病预防(早期癌症检测、儿童预防计划和口腔健康检查)方面,移民背景的人利用率较低。这种较低的使用率在第一代移民、具有双重移民背景、儿童/青少年和妇女中尤为明显。由于方法学的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。由于大多数研究都是横断面研究,因此无法进行因果推断。
利用不平等现象不能用社会经济地位的差异来充分解释。利用率较低的其他原因可能是由于需求、偏好、信息、语言和正式准入障碍(如收费、等待时间、旅行距离或工资损失)的差异。对于某些医疗保健领域和移民群体,需要采取不同的针对移民的具体和敏感的策略来解决这个问题。
该综述方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42014015162)上注册。