Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;146:180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
To perform a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on fracture risk in patients with T2DM.
A systematic search was performed on PubMed/Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2018 to identify RCTs reporting fracture events with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to control group in patients with T2DM. NMA within a Bayesian framework was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) using random effect model. Node splitting method was applied to evaluate the presence of inconsistency for NMA.
A total of 40 RCTs including 32,343 T2DM patients with 466 fracture cases. Pairwise meta-analysis showed no association between risk of fracture and SGLT2 inhibitors use (OR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.83-1.23; p = 0.91; I = 27%) compared with the control group. The NMA has shown a non-significant association with fracture risk and canagliflozin (OR = 0.57, 95%CrI 0.12-1.90), dapagliflozin (OR = 0.58, 95%CrI 0.13-2.00), and empagliflozin (OR = 0.78, 95%CrI 0.23-2.80) use when compared to placebo. No association was also found among SGLT-2 inhibitors (canagliflozin OR = 2.6, 95%CrI 0.69-16.00; dapagliflozin OR = 2.6, 95%CrI 0.52-22.00; and empagliflozin OR = 3.7, 95% CrI 1.0-27.00), when compared to active treatment. Node-splitting analysis shows non-significant inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons.
The current NMA result suggests no detrimental effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on fracture risk in patients with T2DM. Further RCTs and real-world studies with long-term follow up are required to confirm the present findings.
系统评价和网状荟萃分析(NMA)评估 2 型糖尿病患者使用 SGLT2 抑制剂对骨折风险的影响。
系统检索 PubMed/Medline 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 从建库至 2018 年 5 月的文献,以评估 2 型糖尿病患者使用 SGLT2 抑制剂与对照组比较发生骨折的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用贝叶斯框架内的 NMA 计算使用随机效应模型的比值比(OR)和 95%可信区间(CrI)。采用节点分割法评估 NMA 的一致性。
共纳入 40 项 RCT,包含 32343 例 2 型糖尿病患者,共 466 例骨折患者。两两比较荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,SGLT2 抑制剂与骨折风险无关(OR=1.01,95%CI 0.83-1.23;P=0.91;I²=27%)。NMA 结果显示与骨折风险无显著相关性,卡格列净(OR=0.57,95%CrI 0.12-1.90)、达格列净(OR=0.58,95%CrI 0.13-2.00)和恩格列净(OR=0.78,95%CrI 0.23-2.80)与安慰剂相比。SGLT-2 抑制剂之间也没有相关性(卡格列净 OR=2.6,95%CrI 0.69-16.00;达格列净 OR=2.6,95%CrI 0.52-22.00;恩格列净 OR=3.7,95%CrI 1.0-27.00)与活性药物治疗相比。节点分割分析显示直接比较与间接比较之间无显著差异。
目前的 NMA 结果表明,2 型糖尿病患者使用 SGLT2 抑制剂不会增加骨折风险。需要进一步的 RCT 和长期随访的真实世界研究来证实这一发现。