Yu Le-Bao, Fang Zhi-Jun, Yang Xin-Jian, Zhang Dong
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China; Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, People's Hospital of Beijing Daxing District, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e838-e846. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.160. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Recurrent intracranial aneurysms (RAs) remain a daunting challenge for neurosurgeons. This study aimed to explore a potential optimal management strategy of RAs by reviewing the characteristics and management outcomes of 117 RAs.
A total of 117 patients with RAs were treated in a single neurosurgical center from January 2011 to January 2017. The demographic and angiographic characteristics of the patients, treatment approaches, and follow-up outcomes were evaluated.
Of the 117 patients with RAs, 16 (13.7%) and 101 (86.3%) initially underwent microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling, respectively. Coil embolization was used in 75 cases, microsurgical clipping was used in 32 cases, and conservative treatment occurred in 10 cases. Complete clipping was achieved in all 32 aneurysms by microsurgery, and remnants were observed in 25 aneurysms after coiling (33.3%, P < 0.001). Operation-related cerebral infarction occurred in 4 cases (12.5%) with complex and large RA in the clipping group and in 1.3% (1/75) of patients treated with coiling (P = 0.027). Follow-up found similar favorable outcomes in patients after coiling, clipping, and conservative treatment (90.3% vs. 86.7% vs. 80%, respectively; P = 0.711). Follow-up rates of recurrence were significantly higher in the coiling group than the clipping group (26% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.003).
The follow-up outcomes appeared to be acceptable and comparable between the 2 groups. However, in large or giant recurrent aneurysms, sound judgment and the careful selection of treatment are strongly suggested because direct microsurgery has a higher morbidity, even in experienced hands, whereas endovascular coiling is complicated with a higher incomplete occlusion rate.
复发性颅内动脉瘤(RAs)对神经外科医生来说仍然是一项艰巨的挑战。本研究旨在通过回顾117例复发性颅内动脉瘤的特征及治疗结果,探索一种潜在的最佳治疗策略。
2011年1月至2017年1月期间,在单一神经外科中心共治疗了117例复发性颅内动脉瘤患者。评估了患者的人口统计学和血管造影特征、治疗方法及随访结果。
117例复发性颅内动脉瘤患者中,分别有16例(13.7%)和101例(86.3%)最初接受了显微手术夹闭和血管内栓塞治疗。75例采用弹簧圈栓塞,32例采用显微手术夹闭,10例采用保守治疗。显微手术在所有32例动脉瘤中均实现了完全夹闭,而弹簧圈栓塞后25例动脉瘤有残余(33.3%,P<0.001)。夹闭组4例(12.5%)复杂大型复发性颅内动脉瘤患者发生了与手术相关的脑梗死,弹簧圈栓塞治疗的患者中有1.3%(1/75)发生脑梗死(P=0.027)。随访发现,弹簧圈栓塞、夹闭和保守治疗后的患者预后相似(分别为90.3%、86.7%和80%;P=0.711)。弹簧圈栓塞组的复发随访率显著高于夹闭组(分别为26%和0%;P=0.003)。
两组的随访结果似乎可以接受且具有可比性。然而,对于大型或巨大型复发性动脉瘤,强烈建议进行明智的判断并谨慎选择治疗方法,因为即使是经验丰富的医生,直接显微手术的发病率也较高,而血管内栓塞则存在较高的不完全闭塞率。