Gómez-García Francisco, Sanz-Cabanillas Juan L, Viguera-Guerra Isabel, Isla-Tejera Beatriz, Nieto Antonio Vélez-García, Ruano Juan
Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Skin Disease Research Group, IMIBIC/Reina Sofía University Hospital/University of Córdoba, Avenida Menéndez Pidal, Córdoba, 14004, Spain.
Department of Dermatology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal, Córdoba, 14004, Spain.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018 Dec;8(4):539-556. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0269-7. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
Deficiencies in interleukin (IL)-1 receptor (IL-R) antagonist (DIRA) and IL-36R antagonist (DITRA) are rare genetic autoinflammatory diseases related to alterations in antagonists of the IL-1 pathway. IL-1 antagonists may represent therapeutic alternatives. Here, we aim to provide a scoping review of knowledge on use of IL-1-targeting drugs in DIRA and DITRA.
An a priori protocol was published, and the study was conducted using the methodology described in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and the recently published PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review statement. A three-step search using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until March 2018 with additional hand searching was performed. Data charting was performed. The search, article selection, and data extraction were carried out by two researchers independently.
Twenty-four studies on use of anti-IL-1 drugs were included [15 studies including patients with diagnosis of DIRA (n = 19) and 9 studies including patients with diagnosis of DITRA (n = 9)]. Most studies followed a multicenter observational design. Among all patients who received treatment with anti-IL-1 drugs, nine and four mutations in IL1RN and IL36RN were found, respectively. Patients with DIRA were treated with anakinra (n = 17), canakinumab (n = 2), or rinolacept (n = 6). All patients with DITRA were treated with anakinra, and only one case was also treated with canakinumab. Time-to-response frequencies were evaluated as immediate, short, and medium-long term for DIRA (17/17, 15/17, and 9/10, respectively) and DITRA (7/9, 3/9, and 2/9, respectively). Most DITRA patients in whom anti-IL-1 treatment failed experienced good response to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha or anti-IL-12/23 drugs. The safety profiles of treatments were similar in both diseases.
Evidence on use of anti-IL-1 drugs in DIRA and DITRA is scarce and based on observational studies. Larger studies with better methodological quality are needed to increase confidence in use of these drugs in patients with DIRA and DITRA.
白细胞介素(IL)-1受体(IL-R)拮抗剂缺乏症(DIRA)和IL-36R拮抗剂缺乏症(DITRA)是罕见的遗传性自身炎症性疾病,与IL-1通路拮抗剂的改变有关。IL-1拮抗剂可能是治疗选择。在此,我们旨在对DIRA和DITRA中使用IL-1靶向药物的知识进行范围综述。
预先发布了方案,并使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所审稿人手册及最近发布的范围综述PRISMA扩展声明中描述的方法进行研究。使用MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行了三步检索,直至2018年3月,并进行了额外的手工检索。进行了数据图表绘制。检索、文章选择和数据提取由两名研究人员独立进行。
纳入了24项关于使用抗IL-1药物的研究[15项研究纳入了诊断为DIRA的患者(n = 19),9项研究纳入了诊断为DITRA的患者(n = 9)]。大多数研究采用多中心观察性设计。在所有接受抗IL-1药物治疗的患者中,分别在IL1RN和IL36RN中发现了9个和4个突变。DIRA患者接受阿那白滞素治疗(n = 17)、卡那单抗治疗(n = 2)或利诺西普治疗(n = 6)。所有DITRA患者均接受阿那白滞素治疗,只有1例患者还接受了卡那单抗治疗。对DIRA(分别为17/17、15/17和9/10)和DITRA(分别为7/9、3/9和2/9)的反应时间频率评估为即时、短期和中长期。大多数抗IL-1治疗失败的DITRA患者对抗肿瘤坏死因子α或抗IL-12/23药物有良好反应。两种疾病治疗的安全性概况相似。
关于DIRA和DITRA中使用抗IL-1药物的证据稀少且基于观察性研究。需要进行方法学质量更高的更大规模研究,以增加对DIRA和DITRA患者使用这些药物的信心。