Khoroush Maryam, Keshani Fatemeh, Esmaeili Mehdi, Shirazi Moeen Hosseini
Professor of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Assistant Professor of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Jul;15(4):214-221.
The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage in normal and caries-affected dentin (CAD) and to investigate the effect of three hemostatic agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations in CAD.
Ninety-six Class V non-beveled cavities were prepared in 48 third molars at 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) in the cervical margin with the occlusogingival size of 2 mm, mesiodistal dimension of 3 mm, and a depth of 1.5 mm. Next, the teeth were divided into 8 groups (n=12): G1-4 included normal dentin (N) substrate, while G5-8 were exposed to mineralization/demineralization cycles to produce CAD substrate. Groups 1 and 5 were the controls. ViscoStat was used in groups 2 and 6, ViscoStat Clear was used in groups 3 and 7, while trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was used in groups 4 and 8. The cavities were restored with composite resin. The samples were sectioned after thermocycling and immersion in 2% fuchsin for 24 hours. The degree of dye penetration was evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification. Data were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-U-Whitney tests in SPSS 15 software (α=0.05).
Significant differences were recorded on the mean microleakage of different groups (P=0.047). There was a significant difference in the mean dentinal microleakage between N and CAD groups (P=0.014). The dentinal microleakage in group 3 was significantly higher than that in groups 4 to 8.
According to the results, CAD showed less microleakage in comparison with intact dentin. ViscoStat Clear caused a greater microleakage than did ViscoStat or TCA.
本研究旨在比较正常牙本质和龋损牙本质(CAD)中的微渗漏情况,并研究三种止血剂对CAD中Ⅴ类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
在48颗第三磨牙的牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)下方1mm处的颈部边缘制备96个Ⅴ类非斜面洞,咬合龈向尺寸为2mm,近远中径为3mm,深度为1.5mm。接下来,将牙齿分为8组(n = 12):G1-4包括正常牙本质(N)基底,而G5-8经历矿化/脱矿循环以产生CAD基底。第1组和第5组为对照组。第2组和第6组使用ViscoStat,第3组和第7组使用ViscoStat Clear,而第4组和第8组使用三氯乙酸(TCA)。用复合树脂修复窝洞。热循环后将样本切片,并在2%品红中浸泡24小时。在40倍放大倍数的体视显微镜下评估染料渗透程度。使用SPSS 15软件中的Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-U-Whitney检验评估数据(α = 0.05)。
不同组的平均微渗漏有显著差异(P = 0.047)。N组和CAD组之间的平均牙本质微渗漏有显著差异(P = 0.014)。第3组的牙本质微渗漏显著高于第4至8组。
根据结果,与完整牙本质相比,CAD的微渗漏较少。ViscoStat Clear比ViscoStat或TCA导致更大的微渗漏。