de la Iglesia Guadalupe, Castro Solano Alejandro
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02027. eCollection 2018.
The aim of this paper is to explore a new framework for personality assessment that may function as sanity nosology of personality traits: the Positive Personality Model (PPM). The recent publication of DSM-5 created the opportunity to assess personality traits as dimensional constructs (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). In Section III, five maladaptive personality traits are proposed as the maladaptive versions of Five Factor Model (FFM) traits (Costa and McCrae, 1985). This approach draws on the existing idea of conceptualizing pathological and typical personality traits as part of a . It places DSM-5's maladaptive traits in a sickness pole and FFM's traits in a "typical" pole. This spectrum, however, does not include a positive perspective that represents healthy behavior: a sanity nosology. The Positive Traits Inventory-5 (PTI5; de la Iglesia and Castro Solano, 2018) is a measure designed to assess the positive reverse of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Adult (PID-5; Krueger et al., 2013). The 220 positive personality criteria were studied psychometrically using a sample of 1902 Argentinean adults from the general population ( = 39.10, = 13.81, Min = 18, and Max = 83; 50.1% females, 49.9% males). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a five-factor solution. The dimensions were labeled Sprightliness, Integrity, Serenity, Moderation, and Humanity and subsumed under the denomination of PPM. Analyses of convergent validity provided some grounds for interpreting the five positive traits as positive versions of the pathological traits and the typical traits. When tested for its predictive capability on mental health, the PPM outperformed the variance explained by the FFM. It is concluded that the PPM may constitute a positive pole in the continuum of personality traits -possibly functioning as a sanity nosology- and that it is somewhat more related to optimal functioning than typical trait models. The PPM should be confirmed in other populations, its predictive capability ought to be tested with other relevant variables, and longitudinal studies should be done to analyze the stability of the traits over time.
本文旨在探索一种人格评估的新框架,该框架可作为人格特质的健全分类法:积极人格模型(PPM)。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的最新出版为人格特质作为维度结构的评估创造了机会(美国精神病学协会,2013年)。在第三节中,提出了五种适应不良的人格特质,作为五因素模型(FFM)特质(科斯塔和麦克雷,1985年)的适应不良版本。这种方法借鉴了将病理性和典型人格特质概念化为一个整体的现有观点。它将DSM-5的适应不良特质置于疾病极点,将FFM的特质置于“典型”极点。然而,这个谱系并不包括代表健康行为的积极视角:健全分类法。积极特质量表-5(PTI5;德拉伊格莱西亚和卡斯特罗·索拉诺,2018年)是一种旨在评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版成人版人格量表(PID-5;克鲁格等人,2013年)积极反向的测量工具。使用来自阿根廷普通人群的1902名成年人样本(平均年龄 = 39.10岁,标准差 = 13.81岁,最小年龄 = 18岁,最大年龄 = 83岁;女性占50.1%,男性占49.9%)对220个积极人格标准进行了心理测量学研究。探索性和验证性因素分析得出了一个五因素解决方案。这些维度被标记为活泼、正直、宁静、适度和人性,并归入PPM的范畴。收敛效度分析为将这五种积极特质解释为病理性特质和典型特质的积极版本提供了一些依据。当测试其对心理健康的预测能力时,PPM的表现优于FFM所解释的方差。得出的结论是,PPM可能构成人格特质连续体中的积极极点——可能起到健全分类法的作用——并且它与最佳功能的相关性比典型特质模型更强。PPM应在其他人群中得到验证,其预测能力应用其他相关变量进行测试,并且应该进行纵向研究以分析特质随时间的稳定性。