Wagner-Kovacec Jozica, Povalej-Brzan Petra, Mekis Dusan
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Faculty for Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Žitna ulica 15, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 10;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0609-2.
In-wound catheters for infusion of local anaesthetic for post-caesarean section analgesia are well tolerated in parturients. Few studies have examined continuous in-wound infusion of a combination of local anaesthetic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for post-caesarean section analgesia. This single centre study evaluated post-operative analgesic efficacy and piritramide-sparing effects of continuous in-wound infusion of either local anaesthetic or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, or the combination of both, versus saline placebo, when added to systemic analgesia with paracetamol.
After National Ethical Board approval, 59 pregnant women scheduled for non-emergency caesarean section were included in this prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The parturients received spinal anaesthesia with levobupivacaine and fentanyl. Post-operative analgesia to 48 h included paracetamol 1000 mg intravenously every 6 h, with the studied agents as in-wound infusions. Rescue analgesia with piritramide was available as needed, titrated to 2 mg intravenously. Four groups were compared, using a subcutaneous multi-holed catheter connected to an elastomeric pump running at 5 mL/h over 48 h. The different in-wound infusions were: levobupivacaine 0.25% alone; ketorolac tromethamine 0.08% alone; levobupivacaine 0.25% plus ketorolac tromethamine 0.08%; or saline placebo. The primary outcome was total rescue piritramide used at 24 h and 48 h post-operatively, under maintained optimal post-caesarean section analgesia.
Compared to placebo in-wound infusions, ketorolac alone and levobupivacaine plus ketorolac in-wound infusions both significantly reduced post-operative piritramide consumption at 24 h (p = 0.003; p < 0.001, respectively) and 48 h (p = 0.001; p < 0.001). Compared to levobupivacaine, levobupivacaine plus ketorolac significantly reduced post-operative piritramide consumption at 24 h (p = 0.015) and 48 h (p = 0.021). For levobupivacaine versus ketorolac, no significant differences were seen for post-operative piritramide consumption at 24 h and 48 h (p = 0.141; p = 0.054).
Continuous in-wound infusion with levobupivacaine plus ketorolac provides greater opioid-sparing effects than continuous in-wound infusion with levobupivacaine alone.
German Clinical Trials Register: retrospectively registered on 30 July, 2014, DRKS 00006559 .
用于剖宫产术后镇痛的伤口内局部麻醉药输注导管在产妇中耐受性良好。很少有研究探讨伤口内持续输注局部麻醉药与非甾体抗炎药联合用于剖宫产术后镇痛的情况。这项单中心研究评估了在对乙酰氨基酚全身镇痛基础上,伤口内持续输注局部麻醉药或非甾体抗炎药或两者联合,相对于生理盐水安慰剂的术后镇痛效果及哌替啶节省效应。
经国家伦理委员会批准后,59例计划行非急诊剖宫产的孕妇被纳入这项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。产妇接受左旋布比卡因和芬太尼的脊髓麻醉。术后48小时的镇痛包括每6小时静脉注射1000毫克对乙酰氨基酚,研究药物通过伤口内输注给药。必要时可用哌替啶进行补救镇痛,静脉滴定至2毫克。使用连接到弹性泵的皮下多孔导管,以5毫升/小时的速度持续48小时,比较四组情况。不同的伤口内输注药物分别为:单独使用0.25%左旋布比卡因;单独使用0.08%酮咯酸氨丁三醇;0.25%左旋布比卡因加0.08%酮咯酸氨丁三醇;或生理盐水安慰剂。主要结局指标是术后24小时和48小时在维持最佳剖宫产术后镇痛的情况下使用的哌替啶总量。
与安慰剂伤口内输注相比,单独使用酮咯酸和左旋布比卡因加酮咯酸的伤口内输注均显著减少了术后24小时(分别为p = 0.003;p < 0.001)和48小时(p = 0.001;p < 0.001)的哌替啶消耗量。与左旋布比卡因相比,左旋布比卡因加酮咯酸显著减少了术后24小时(p = 0.015)和48小时(p = 0.021)的哌替啶消耗量。对于左旋布比卡因与酮咯酸,术后24小时和48小时的哌替啶消耗量无显著差异(p = 0.141;p = 0.054)。
与单独伤口内持续输注左旋布比卡因相比,左旋布比卡因加酮咯酸的伤口内持续输注具有更大的阿片类药物节省效应。
德国临床试验注册中心:于2014年7月30日追溯注册,DRKS 00006559 。