Hock Barry D, McKenzie Judith L, Goddard Liping, Smith Stewart M, McEntyre Christopher J, Keating Paula E
Haematology Research Group, Christchurch Hospital.
Immunology Section, Canterbury Health Laboratories.
Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Dec;40(6):705-715. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000553.
The measurement of anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels in adalimumab (ADAL)-treated and infliximab (IFX)-treated patients is critical for guiding therapeutic strategies. The homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA) and affinity capture elution (ACE) assay provide effective, drug-tolerant formats for measuring total ADA levels. However, their ability to discriminate between ADA from samples with or without neutralizing capacity is unclear and therefore was analyzed in this study.
Sera from ADAL and IFX patients with low drug levels (<1 mcg/mL) were analyzed by ACE, HMSA, and bridging assay. Neutralizing capacity was determined by competitive ligand-binding assay.
HMSA and ACE detected high ADA levels in all ADAL (19/42) and IFX (27/64) samples with neutralizing capacity. ADA was also detected in most of the samples without neutralizing capacity, but levels were significantly lower (P < 0.0001). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that for both assays, ADA levels were a strong discriminatory marker of neutralizing ADA (area under the curve > 0.9, P < 0.0001). Using a signal >8× background as a cut-point, neutralizing ADA could be identified with high specificity (HMSA > 95%, ACE > 85%) and sensitivity (HMSA > 70%, ACE > 80%). The detection of multimeric drug-ADA complexes after HMSA was also a highly specific marker (specificity > 95%) of neutralizing ADA in both ADAL and IFX patients. Results using ACE and HMSA were highly correlated.
Results obtained after HMSA and ACE analysis are strongly correlated, and in both assays, high ADA levels are a specific marker of neutralizing capacity. The detection of multimeric complexes by HMSA also selectively identifies sera with neutralizing capacity. These data support the use of these assays as quantitative rather than simple qualitative measures of ADA.
在接受阿达木单抗(ADAL)和英夫利昔单抗(IFX)治疗的患者中,测量抗药物抗体(ADA)水平对于指导治疗策略至关重要。均相迁移率变动分析(HMSA)和亲和捕获洗脱(ACE)分析为测量总ADA水平提供了有效、耐药物的方法。然而,它们区分具有或不具有中和能力的样本中ADA的能力尚不清楚,因此本研究对其进行了分析。
通过ACE、HMSA和桥接分析对ADAL和IFX患者中药物水平较低(<1 mcg/mL)的血清进行分析。通过竞争性配体结合分析确定中和能力。
HMSA和ACE在所有具有中和能力的ADAL(19/42)和IFX(27/64)样本中检测到高ADA水平。在大多数不具有中和能力的样本中也检测到了ADA,但水平显著较低(P < 0.0001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,对于这两种分析方法,ADA水平都是中和性ADA的强鉴别标志物(曲线下面积>0.9,P < 0.0001)。以信号>8×背景作为切点,可以高特异性(HMSA>95%,ACE>85%)和高灵敏度(HMSA>70%,ACE>80%)识别中和性ADA。HMSA后检测到的多聚体药物-ADA复合物也是ADAL和IFX患者中中和性ADA的高度特异性标志物(特异性>95%)。使用ACE和HMSA得到的结果高度相关。
HMSA和ACE分析后获得的结果高度相关,并且在这两种分析中,高ADA水平是中和能力的特异性标志物。通过HMSA检测多聚体复合物也能选择性地识别具有中和能力的血清。这些数据支持将这些分析方法用作ADA的定量而非简单定性测量方法。