Kim Joon-Hee
Department of Sports & Outdoors, College of Health Industry, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Oct 31;14(5):791-801. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836424.212. eCollection 2018 Oct.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different weight reduction methods on the body composition characteristics, cardiopulmonary functions, and health promotion of elite bodybuilding athletes in a comprehensive manner. For this purpose, the study analyzed the effects of two different weight reduction methods on 25 elite bodybuilding athletes registered at the Bodybuilding Association over a period of 6 weeks. There were interactive effects on macronutrients, macrominerals, and antioxidants according to weight reduction methods as the experiment group (6%±2%) maintained a certain amount of food intakes across various nutrients including energy intakes or made a slow decrease it, whereas the traditional group (16%±4%) made a sharp decrease in it due to relatively greater weight reduction than the experiment group and thus showed pattern differences from it. As for immunity variables, there was an increase to certain cytokines despite the traditional high weight reduction method, but it caused no excessive reduction of immunity or rapid decrease to certain factors of body composition. In addition, there were no significant differences in main and interactive effects on the one-repetition maximum of bench press and squat, which are two functional indicators of health promotion. These findings imply that the low weight reduction method within the range of 6%±2% minimized or maintained changes to muscle circumference or mass while causing no improvement to muscular strength.
本研究的目的是全面调查不同减重方法对精英健美运动员身体成分特征、心肺功能和健康促进的影响。为此,该研究分析了两种不同减重方法对25名在健美协会注册的精英健美运动员在6周时间内的影响。根据减重方法,对常量营养素、常量矿物质和抗氧化剂存在交互作用,因为实验组(6%±2%)在包括能量摄入在内的各种营养素中保持一定量的食物摄入量或缓慢减少,而传统组(16%±4%)由于减重幅度相对大于实验组,因此摄入量急剧下降,从而呈现出与实验组不同的模式差异。至于免疫变量,尽管采用传统的高减重方法,但某些细胞因子有所增加,但并未导致免疫力过度下降或身体成分某些因素的快速下降。此外,对卧推和深蹲的一次重复最大值这两个健康促进功能指标的主要和交互作用没有显著差异。这些发现表明,6%±2%范围内的低减重方法在使肌肉周长或质量变化最小化或保持不变的同时,并未提高肌肉力量。