• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未来不久美国西部的森林易受干旱和火灾的影响。

Near-future forest vulnerability to drought and fire varies across the western United States.

机构信息

Department of Forest Ecosystems, and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

SLevis Consulting, LLC, Oceanside, California.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jan;25(1):290-303. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14490. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.14490
PMID:30444042
Abstract

Recent prolonged droughts and catastrophic wildfires in the western United States have raised concerns about the potential for forest mortality to impact forest structure, forest ecosystem services, and the economic vitality of communities in the coming decades. We used the Community Land Model (CLM) to determine forest vulnerability to mortality from drought and fire by the year 2049. We modified CLM to represent 13 major forest types in the western United States and ran simulations at a 4-km grid resolution, driven with climate projections from two general circulation models under one emissions scenario (RCP 8.5). We developed metrics of vulnerability to short-term extreme and prolonged drought based on annual allocation to stem growth and net primary productivity. We calculated fire vulnerability based on changes in simulated future area burned relative to historical area burned. Simulated historical drought vulnerability was medium to high in areas with observations of recent drought-related mortality. Comparisons of observed and simulated historical area burned indicate simulated future fire vulnerability could be underestimated by 3% in the Sierra Nevada and overestimated by 3% in the Rocky Mountains. Projections show that water-limited forests in the Rocky Mountains, Southwest, and Great Basin regions will be the most vulnerable to future drought-related mortality, and vulnerability to future fire will be highest in the Sierra Nevada and portions of the Rocky Mountains. High carbon-density forests in the Pacific coast and western Cascades regions are projected to be the least vulnerable to either drought or fire. Importantly, differences in climate projections lead to only 1% of the domain with conflicting low and high vulnerability to fire and no area with conflicting drought vulnerability. Our drought vulnerability metrics could be incorporated as probabilistic mortality rates in earth system models, enabling more robust estimates of the feedbacks between the land and atmosphere over the 21st century.

摘要

近年来,美国西部持续的长时间干旱和灾难性野火引发了人们对未来几十年森林死亡率可能影响森林结构、森林生态系统服务以及社区经济活力的担忧。我们使用了社区土地模型(CLM)来确定森林对干旱和火灾死亡率的脆弱性,预计这一情况将在 2049 年出现。我们对 CLM 进行了修改,以代表美国西部的 13 种主要森林类型,并在 4 公里的网格分辨率下进行了模拟,驱动因素是两个大气环流模型在一种排放情景(RCP8.5)下的气候预测。我们根据茎生长和净初级生产力的年分配来制定短期极端干旱和长期干旱脆弱性的指标。我们根据模拟未来面积燃烧相对于历史面积燃烧的变化来计算火灾脆弱性。模拟的历史干旱脆弱性在有近期干旱相关死亡率观测的地区为中等到高。对观测和模拟历史时期的火灾面积的比较表明,模拟未来的火灾脆弱性在内华达山脉可能低估了 3%,在落基山脉可能高估了 3%。预测显示,落基山脉、西南部和大盆地地区的水分限制森林将最容易受到未来与干旱相关的死亡率的影响,而在内华达山脉和落基山脉的部分地区,未来火灾的脆弱性将最高。太平洋沿岸和西部喀斯喀特山脉地区的高碳密度森林预计对干旱或火灾的脆弱性最低。重要的是,气候预测的差异仅导致 1%的区域存在对火灾脆弱性的低和高的冲突,没有任何区域存在对干旱脆弱性的冲突。我们的干旱脆弱性指标可以作为概率死亡率纳入地球系统模型,从而更准确地估计 21 世纪陆地和大气之间的反馈。

相似文献

1
Near-future forest vulnerability to drought and fire varies across the western United States.未来不久美国西部的森林易受干旱和火灾的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jan;25(1):290-303. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14490. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
A review of the relationships between drought and forest fire in the United States.美国干旱与森林火灾关系综述。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2353-69. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13275. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Future changes in fire weather, spring droughts, and false springs across U.S. National Forests and Grasslands.未来美国国家森林和草原火灾天气、春季干旱和虚假春天的变化。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Jul;29(5):e01904. doi: 10.1002/eap.1904. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
Response of Sierra Nevada forests to projected climate-wildfire interactions.内华达山脉森林对预计的气候-野火相互作用的响应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 May;23(5):2016-2030. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13544. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
5
[Forest fire risk assessment for China under different climate scenarios.].[不同气候情景下中国森林火灾风险评估。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Mar;27(3):769-776. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.034.
6
Can wildland fire management alter 21st-century subalpine fire and forests in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA?能否通过管理野外火灾来改变 21 世纪美国怀俄明州大提顿国家公园的亚高山火和森林?
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02030. doi: 10.1002/eap.2030. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Prioritizing forest fuels treatments based on the probability of high-severity fire restores adaptive capacity in Sierran forests.根据高严重度火灾的发生概率对森林燃料处理进行优先级排序,可恢复塞拉内华达森林的适应能力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):729-737. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13913. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
8
Are High-Severity Fires Burning at Much Higher Rates Recently than Historically in Dry-Forest Landscapes of the Western USA?在美国西部干旱森林景观中,近期高烈度火灾的发生频率是否比历史上高得多?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 9;10(9):e0136147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136147. eCollection 2015.
9
Demographic trends in community functional tolerance reflect tree responses to climate and altered fire regimes.社区功能耐性的人口趋势反映了树木对气候和改变的火灾发生频率的响应。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Dec;30(8):e02197. doi: 10.1002/eap.2197. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
Landscape-scale restoration minimizes tree growth vulnerability to 21 century drought in a dry forest.景观尺度的恢复最大限度地降低了干旱森林树木对 21 世纪干旱的生长脆弱性。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Mar;31(2):e2238. doi: 10.1002/eap.2238. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbon, climate, and natural disturbance: a review of mechanisms, challenges, and tools for understanding forest carbon stability in an uncertain future.碳、气候与自然干扰:对理解不确定未来森林碳稳定性的机制、挑战及工具的综述
Carbon Balance Manag. 2024 Oct 10;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13021-024-00282-0.
2
Rapid Growth of Large Forest Fires Drives the Exponential Response of Annual Forest-Fire Area to Aridity in the Western United States.大型森林火灾的快速增长推动了美国西部年度森林火灾面积对干旱的指数响应。
Geophys Res Lett. 2022 Mar 16;49(5):e2021GL097131. doi: 10.1029/2021GL097131. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Future climate risks from stress, insects and fire across US forests.
美国森林面临压力、虫害和火灾导致的未来气候风险。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Jun;25(6):1510-1520. doi: 10.1111/ele.14018. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Improving CLM5.0 Biomass and Carbon Exchange Across the Western United States Using a Data Assimilation System.利用数据同化系统改进美国西部的CLM5.0生物量和碳交换
J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2021 Jul;13(7):e2020MS002421. doi: 10.1029/2020MS002421. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
5
An Ecological Perspective on Living with Fire in Ponderosa Pine Forests of Oregon and Washington: Resistance, Gone but not Forgotten.俄勒冈州和华盛顿州黄松林中与火共生的生态学视角:抗性,消逝却未被遗忘。
Trees For People. 2021 Jun 1;4. doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100074.
6
Effects of temperature frequency trends on projected japonica rice ( L.) yield and dry matter distribution with elevated carbon dioxide.温度频率趋势对二氧化碳浓度升高条件下粳稻产量及干物质分配的影响
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 11;9:e11027. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11027. eCollection 2021.
7
Researcher profile: Beverly Law.
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Apr;27(8):1501-1503. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15495. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
8
Evaluating genomic data for management of local adaptation in a changing climate: A lodgepole pine case study.评估基因组数据以应对气候变化中的局部适应性管理:以黑松为例的案例研究。
Evol Appl. 2019 Sep 30;13(1):116-131. doi: 10.1111/eva.12871. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States.美国西部保护森林的固碳和生物多样性协同效益。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02039. doi: 10.1002/eap.2039. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
10
Can wildland fire management alter 21st-century subalpine fire and forests in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA?能否通过管理野外火灾来改变 21 世纪美国怀俄明州大提顿国家公园的亚高山火和森林?
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02030. doi: 10.1002/eap.2030. Epub 2019 Dec 2.