Suppr超能文献

中文版本的康复自评量表:来自 Rasch 分析和可靠性估计的心理测量证据。

Chinese version of the Recovery Self-Assessment scale: psychometric evidence from Rasch analysis and reliability estimates.

机构信息

a Hong Kong Hospital Authority , Kowloon , Hong Kong.

b Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Kowloon , Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2019 Apr;28(2):206-212. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1521931. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA) is a popular and well-validated instrument for assessing recovery-oriented service around the world.

AIMS

This study aims to develop a Chinese version of the RSA, which assesses the recovery orientation of hospital-based mental health services.

METHODS

We conducted forward and backward translations of the RSA and modify the translated Chinese based on comments by content experts. We recruited 350 people with mental illnesses who regularly attend hospital and community mental health services. The participants completed the Chinese Recovery Self-Assessment Service User version (CRSA-SU) and convergent measures on hope and mental well-being.

RESULTS

The Rasch analysis supported five of the six factors in the instrument and suggests that the "Life Goal" factor could be further split into two factors. We identified three misfit items (items 6, 12 and 17) that could be considered for removal. Both the internal consistency and test-retest reliability are between satisfactory and very good within each subscale, with the exception of the Choice subscale. The seven subscales had low positive correlations with measures of hope and mental well-being, which supported the convergent validity of CRSA-SU.

CONCLUSIONS

The results supported the factor structure, reliability and validity of the CRSA-SU.

摘要

背景

康复自评量表(RSA)是一种在全球范围内用于评估以康复为导向的服务的流行且经过充分验证的工具。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种中文版 RSA,用于评估基于医院的精神卫生服务的康复取向。

方法

我们对 RSA 进行了正向和反向翻译,并根据内容专家的意见修改了翻译后的中文。我们招募了 350 名经常参加医院和社区精神卫生服务的精神疾病患者。参与者完成了中文版康复自评量表服务用户版(CRSA-SU)和希望与心理健康的聚合测量。

结果

Rasch 分析支持该工具的六个因素中的五个因素,并表明“生活目标”因素可以进一步分为两个因素。我们确定了三个不适合的项目(项目 6、12 和 17),可以考虑删除。除了选择分量表外,每个分量表的内部一致性和重测信度都在满意和非常好之间。七个分量表与希望和心理健康的测量值呈低度正相关,这支持了 CRSA-SU 的聚合效度。

结论

结果支持 CRSA-SU 的因子结构、信度和效度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验