Suppr超能文献

患者特征和重症监护工作流程会影响神经重症监护中的传呼频率。

Patient characteristics and critical care workflow affect paging frequency in neurocritical care.

作者信息

Lele Abhijit V, Qiu Qian, Gorbachov Sergii, Fong Christine, Nair Bala G, Blissitt Pat, Marsh Rebekah, Chaikittisilpa Nophanan, Krishnamoorthy Vijay, Vavilala Monica S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.144. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Abstract

Indicator of response urgency (page tag), paging domains, distribution of pages by time of the day, and factors associated with neurocritical care paging remain elusive and were examined in this study. We examined the association between patient, neurocritical care workflow characteristics, and paging domains on frequency of paging using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and analysis of covariance. A total of 1852 patients generated 36,472 pages. The most common page tagging was "for your information" (n = 15067, 41.3%), while 2.8% (n = 1006) pages were tagged urgent. Paging was most frequent for cardiovascular (12.2%), pain, agitation, distress (6.9%) and sodium (5.3%) concerns. Paging frequency was highest for mechanically ventilated patients (p < 0.001), those with indwelling intracranial pressure monitor (p < 0.04), arterial catheter (p < 0.001), central venous access catheter (p < 0.001), and in those with lower Glasgow Coma Score (p < 0.001). Patients admitted between 18:00-06:00 (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16-1.86) and 14:30-18:00 (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.86), and sodium (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.39-1.66), and cardiovascular concerns (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.32) were associated with higher night time paging frequency. Incorporating paging domains in daily workflow and their impact on outcome of paging on escalation of clinical care and patient outcomes warrants further examination.

摘要

响应紧急程度指标(页面标签)、寻呼域、按一天中的时间分布的寻呼情况以及与神经重症监护寻呼相关的因素仍不明确,本研究对此进行了调查。我们使用学生 t 检验、卡方检验和协方差分析,研究了患者、神经重症监护工作流程特征和寻呼域与寻呼频率之间的关联。共有 1852 名患者产生了 36472 次寻呼。最常见的页面标签是“供您参考”(n = 15067,41.3%),而 2.8%(n = 1006)的页面被标记为紧急。心血管问题(12.2%)、疼痛、躁动、痛苦(6.9%)和钠相关问题(5.3%)的寻呼最为频繁。机械通气患者(p < 0.001)、留置颅内压监测器的患者(p < 0.04)、动脉导管患者(p < 0.001)、中心静脉通路导管患者(p < 0.001)以及格拉斯哥昏迷评分较低的患者(p < 0.001)的寻呼频率最高。18:00 - 06:00 入院的患者(调整后比值比 1.47,95%置信区间 1.16 - 1.86)、14:30 - 18:00 入院的患者(调整后比值比 1.46,95%置信区间 1.14 - 1.86)、钠相关问题(调整后比值比 1.52,95%置信区间 1.39 - 1.66)和心血管问题(调整后比值比 1.24,95%置信区间 1.15 - 1.32)与夜间寻呼频率较高有关。将寻呼域纳入日常工作流程及其对临床护理升级和患者结局的寻呼结果的影响值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验