Suppr超能文献

唾液腺超声不同评分系统对干燥综合征诊断准确性的系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasonography with different scoring systems in Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China.

Department of National Clinical Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 20;8(1):17128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35288-5.

Abstract

Noninvasive objective salivary gland ultrasonography (SGU) had been widely used to evaluate major salivary gland involvement in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and treatment responses. However, the evaluation score, diagnostic sensitivity, and diagnostic specificity significantly varied among clinical studies. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different SGU scoring systems using the American-European Consensus Group criteria. Of the 1301 articles retrieved from six databases, 24 met the criteria for quality assessment and 14 for meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivities were 75% (0-4) with I = 92.0%, 84% (0-16) with I = 63.6%, and 75% (0-48) with I = 90.9%; the pooled specificities were 93% (0-4) with I = 71.5%, 88% (0-16) with I = 65.4%, and 95% (0-48) with I = 83.9%; the pooled diagnostic odds ratios were 71.26 (0-4) with I = 0%, 46.3 (0-16) with I = 73.8%, and 66.07 (0-48) I = 0%; the areas under the SROC curves were 0.95 (0-4), 0.93 (0-16), and 0.94 (0-48). These results indicated that the 0-4 scoring system has a higher specificity and a less heterogeneity than other systems, and could be used as a universal SGU diagnostic standard.

摘要

非侵入性客观唾液腺超声 (SGU) 已广泛用于评估原发性干燥综合征 (pSS) 中大唾液腺的受累情况和治疗反应。然而,不同临床研究之间的评估评分、诊断灵敏度和诊断特异性差异显著。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估使用美国-欧洲共识组标准的不同 SGU 评分系统的诊断准确性。从六个数据库中检索到的 1301 篇文章中,有 24 篇符合质量评估标准,有 14 篇符合荟萃分析标准。汇总的敏感度分别为 75%(0-4),I²=92.0%;84%(0-16),I²=63.6%;75%(0-48),I²=90.9%;汇总的特异度分别为 93%(0-4),I²=71.5%;88%(0-16),I²=65.4%;95%(0-48),I²=83.9%;汇总的诊断优势比分别为 71.26(0-4),I²=0%;46.3(0-16),I²=73.8%;66.07(0-48),I²=0%;SROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.95(0-4)、0.93(0-16)和 0.94(0-48)。这些结果表明,0-4 评分系统比其他系统具有更高的特异性和更小的异质性,可作为通用的 SGU 诊断标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ea/6244082/069c1a3dab2b/41598_2018_35288_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验