Suppr超能文献

左心室导线位置与心脏再同步治疗患者的长期预后

Left Ventricular Lead Location and Long-Term Outcomes in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients.

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Semmelweis University, Heart Center, Budapest, Hungary.

Semmelweis University, Heart Center, Budapest, Hungary; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;4(11):1410-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to evaluate the association of left ventricular (LV) lead location and long-term outcomes in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the association of lead location with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D).

METHODS

The LV lead location was classified in 797 patients with CRT-D, in 569 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), in 228 patients with non-LBBB, and in 505 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. Leads were classified into apical (n = 83) and non-apical (n = 486); with the non-apical LV leads further categorized into anterior (n = 99) and posterior/lateral (n = 387) within LBBB. All-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) events were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses.

RESULTS

In CRT-D patients with LBBB and posterior/lateral LV lead location, there was an association with a significant reduction in long-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37 to 0.79; p = 0.001), and HF events (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.60; p < 0.001) compared to an ICD only, accompanied with better LV reverse remodeling. CRT-D patients with LBBB and an anterior LV lead location were shown to be associated with a significant reduction in HF events compared to an ICD only (anterior HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.82; p = 0.006); however, no association with mortality reduction was observed from CRT-D versus an ICD only. CRT-D was not associated with improved outcomes in non-LBBB patients, regardless of LV lead location.

CONCLUSIONS

In mild HF patients with LBBB and an implanted CRT-D, lateral/posterior, and anterior LV lead locations are similarly associated with reduction in the risk of HF or death events compared to ICD alone. Mortality benefit derived from CRT-D is associated only with patients with lateral/posterior LV lead location. An apical LV lead location should be avoided due to the early risk of death whenever possible. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT], NCT00180271; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Post Approval Registry [MADIT-CRT-PAR], NCT01294449; and MADIT-CRT Long-Term International Follow-Up Registry - Europe, NCT02060110).

摘要

目的

作者旨在评估左心室(LV)导联位置与心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)的长期结局之间的关系。

背景

在接受心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)治疗的患者中,关于导联位置与长期临床结局的关联,数据有限。

方法

在 797 例 CRT-D 患者、569 例左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者、228 例非 LBBB 患者和 505 例仅植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者中,对 LV 导联位置进行了分类。导联分为心尖部(n=83)和非心尖部(n=486);对于 LBBB 患者,非心尖部导联进一步分为前(n=99)和后/侧(n=387)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 分析评估全因死亡率和心力衰竭(HF)事件。

结果

在 LBBB 且 LV 后/侧导联位置的 CRT-D 患者中,与仅植入 ICD 相比,全因死亡率(风险比[HR]:0.54,95%置信区间[CI]:0.37 至 0.79;p=0.001)和 HF 事件(HR:0.44,95%CI:0.33 至 0.60;p<0.001)显著降低,同时 LV 逆重构改善。与仅植入 ICD 相比,LBBB 且 LV 前导联位置的 CRT-D 患者发生 HF 事件的风险显著降低(前 HR:0.50,95%CI:0.30 至 0.82;p=0.006);然而,与仅植入 ICD 相比,死亡率降低没有观察到关联。无论 LV 导联位置如何,CRT-D 与非 LBBB 患者的结局改善均无关。

结论

在轻度 HF 合并 LBBB 且植入 CRT-D 的患者中,LV 后/侧和前导联位置与 HF 或死亡事件风险降低的相关性相似,与仅植入 ICD 相比。CRT-D 带来的生存获益仅与 LV 后/侧导联位置的患者相关。应尽可能避免心尖部 LV 导联位置,因为早期死亡风险较高。(多中心自动除颤器植入伴心脏再同步治疗[MADIT-CRT],NCT00180271;多中心自动除颤器植入伴心脏再同步治疗后批准注册研究[MADIT-CRT-PAR],NCT01294449;以及 MADIT-CRT 长期国际随访注册研究-欧洲,NCT02060110)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验