Valros Anna, Hänninen Laura
Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Animals (Basel). 2018 Nov 23;8(12):220. doi: 10.3390/ani8120220.
Veterinary students face several ethical challenges during their curriculum. We used the Animal Ethics Dilemma to study animal ethical views of Finnish veterinary students, and also asked them to score the level of pain perception in 13 different species. Based on the 218 respondents, the utilitarian view was the dominating ethical view. Mammals were given higher pain scores than other animals. The proportion of the respect for nature view correlated negatively, and that of the animal rights view positively, with most animal pain scores. Fifth year students had a higher percentage of contractarian views, as compared to 1st and 3rd year students, but this might have been confounded by their age. Several pain perception scores increased with increasing study years. We conclude that the utilitarian view was clearly dominating, and that ethical views differed only slightly between students at different stages of their studies. Higher pain perception scores in students at a later stage of their studies might reflect an increased knowledge of animal capacities.
兽医专业的学生在其课程学习期间面临着若干伦理挑战。我们运用“动物伦理困境”来研究芬兰兽医专业学生的动物伦理观,并且还要求他们对13种不同物种的疼痛感知程度进行评分。基于218名受访者的情况,功利主义观点是占主导地位的伦理观点。哺乳动物的疼痛评分高于其他动物。尊重自然观点的比例与大多数动物疼痛评分呈负相关,而动物权利观点的比例与大多数动物疼痛评分呈正相关。与一年级和三年级学生相比,五年级学生持有契约主义观点的比例更高,但这可能受到他们年龄的影响。随着学习年限的增加,几个疼痛感知评分有所上升。我们得出结论,功利主义观点明显占主导地位,并且不同学习阶段的学生之间的伦理观点仅有细微差异。处于学习后期阶段的学生较高的疼痛感知评分可能反映出他们对动物能力的了解有所增加。