Suppr超能文献

一项比较强化人乳与婴儿配方奶粉与未强化人乳对早产儿极低出生体重儿生长影响的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of fortification of human milk with an infant formula powder versus unfortified human milk on the growth of preterm very low birth weight infants.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.

Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(15):2507-2515. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1554046. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

Abstract

To optimize growth in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants, human milk fortification is standard of care in neonatal units of high-income countries. However, commercial fortifiers may not be available or it may be too expensive in resource-limited settings. As an alternative to using human milk fortifiers, we studied the effects of milk fortification with an infant formula on growth and biochemical parameters of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants We undertook a prospective, randomized controlled trial in the neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital in South India. Preterm infants weighing <1500 grams and <34 weeks of gestation were randomized after stratification according to birth weight into two groups (<1250 g and 1250 to <1500 g). One group received fortified human milk while the other received exclusive human milk. The fortification was done with a commercially available infant milk powder added to expressed breast milk (when the infant reached 150 ml/kg/day of feeds) and continued till the infant reached 1800 g. The primary outcome was the rate of weight gain/kg/day. Secondary outcome measures were linear growth, head circumference increase, biochemical parameters to assess the adequacy or excess of protein supplementation and comorbidities like feed intolerance, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Total of 163 babies were randomized during the study period, of whom 148 babies (73 in the standard arm and 75 in the fortification arm) completed the trial. Baseline demographic data among the two groups were comparable. Weight gain/kg/day (mean difference (MD) 1.98 g/kg/day; 95% CI: 1.03-2.92; <.001) and linear growth (MD 0.09 cm/week; 95% CI: 0.02-0.2; =.02) was significantly higher in the fortification arm as compared to the control arm. The head growth (head circumference gain in cm/week) was higher and length of hospital stay lesser in the fortification arm, though not statistically significant. Biochemical parameters, rates of sepsis, feed intolerance, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were not different between the two groups. Fortification with Infant milk powder achieves better growth parameters than unfortified human milk and can be a useful alternative for feeding preterm VLBW infants in low resource settings.

摘要

为了优化极低出生体重儿(VLBW)的生长,高收入国家的新生儿病房标准做法是对母乳进行强化。然而,在资源有限的环境下,商业强化剂可能不可用或过于昂贵。作为使用母乳强化剂的替代方法,我们研究了使用婴儿配方奶粉对极低出生体重儿(VLBW)生长和生化参数的影响。我们在印度南部一家三级保健医院的新生儿病房进行了一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。将出生体重 <1500 克和妊娠 34 周以下的早产儿根据出生体重分层后随机分为两组(<1250 克和 1250 至 <1500 克)。一组接受强化人乳,另一组接受纯人乳。强化方法是将市售婴儿奶粉添加到人乳中(当婴儿达到 150 毫升/公斤/天的喂养量时),并持续至婴儿体重达到 1800 克。主要结局指标为体重增加量/公斤/天。次要结局指标包括线性生长、头围增加、评估蛋白质补充是否充足或过量的生化参数以及喂养不耐受、败血症和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)等并发症。研究期间共随机分配了 163 名婴儿,其中 148 名婴儿(标准组 73 名,强化组 75 名)完成了试验。两组的基线人口统计学数据相当。强化组的体重增加量/公斤/天(平均差异(MD)1.98 克/公斤/天;95%CI:1.03-2.92;<.001)和线性生长(MD 0.09 厘米/周;95%CI:0.02-0.2;=.02)均明显高于对照组。强化组的头围生长(头围每周增加厘米数)较高,住院时间较短,但无统计学意义。两组的生化参数、败血症、喂养不耐受和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的发生率无差异。与未强化人乳相比,婴儿奶粉强化可使生长参数得到更好的改善,可为资源有限的环境下喂养极低出生体重早产儿提供一种有用的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验